>>8910327

Was everything notable last bread. Again so many un nominated news articles by one or two posters.

None of these articles have been vetted. The sources have not been researched, it is just as bad as the sheeple reading MSM.

We are the new now means we og to the source of the article and verivy, we research the reporter and the publisher.

We add to the article the information they left out.

If no one is interested enough to do that with each article in notables then the article is not worthy to be in the list of notables.

>>8910418

Most of the news articles.

Notables from the morning look more like Drudge report than a research board. We should be analyzing the news, not just consuming it.

>>8910570

Include it if it has been vetted. Has the link even been tested on all those articles?

There isn't time when there are 30+ in a bread to vet each one.

If an anon thinks a particular news article should be in notables they should test the link, verify that the article and text in post match, verify the source the reporter uses.

When news cam out that Kim Jong Un was "brain dead" many anons looked at the head line and ran with it.

A few of us did some digging and found that the source was an unnamed Govt official who talked to a CNN reporter. All other MSM carried the story.

It was embarrassing to see anons taking the word of a CNN reporter before they even checked to see where the story originated.

>>8910865

Pool's closed.