>>8913156 (pb)

If you make a car, can you crush one car and make it magically appear as a new car? No.

If you make two identical cars, and crush one, can you say the car that survived is the car that was crushed? No.

If you make one car, and then slowly replicate the car with another car, and then crush the original car, can you say the replicated car is the original one? No.

I dont care how you slice it, you cant defeat logic by claiming a lack of logic.

If the 'soul' is bound to the mind, its relevance is due to the history of the mind. If you make another person to appear like that of the original, that doesnt mean it is.

If you believe the soul can 'transfer' it would require some context seperate from which the new host could exist. If the soul is defined and derived by the original, and there are any differences in the new host… is it the original? Or just a replica? If it is a replica, what purpose does destroying the original serve.

If anything, it is only an act.