Various posts last bread go me thinking..

What if indictment doesn't mean what we think? I mean in Q3716 and Q3717.

Those posts don't actually make much sense.

It doesn't matter what the first indictment to be unsealed might be… it WON'T trigger "mass pop awakening".

Even if HRC, Gates, Hanks name your pick… many will think it is Trump fuckery.

And ESPECIALLY if the arrest comes later…

What if "indictment" is actually a puzzle for anons…

Break it down… anons called "impeachment" Peach Mint right?

So spell it IN DICT MINT.

MINT is GREEN… the green light.

Check Q206: "Can't wait for the green light."

Maybe that means Anons CAN'T wait… maybe Anons need to do something or figure something out FIRST?

But now take IN DICT as IN DICTIONARY.

Check Q3929…

Q links to a dictionary definition of START. But we all know what the word "START" means..

Maybe that line is what Q is pointing to by "1st indictment"… FIRST=START IN DICTIONARY.

OK, now check the post date: 4/10/20.

Some anon last night caught that Q had deleted all posts on /projectdcomms except the first and one dated: 4/10/20. DJT

Not sure where to go.. but now that I'm the thinking the "first indictment" is NOT going to trigger a "mass pop awakening".

Pop = popcorn? Anons need to serve the popcorn?