Legal question:
If Bill Gates puts his smart nanos into vaccines, are they still JUST vaccines? Will the "enhanced" vaccines still qualify for vaccine exemption from liability? Or will they have just opened themselves up to lawsuit? After all, if they add the smart nanos, then there will now be something in the bottles that has a purpose other than preventing disease.
Perhaps, if they can convince us that the arsenic is necessary to make the vaccine work. But what if the item has no disease prevention function whatsoever but has another function altogether, i.e. tracking the recipient?
Let me put it another way. We've heard allegations from African doctors that vaccines provided to them by the WHO had substances in them to create infertility. If they tried foisting adulterated vaccines on us here, would anything be done about it?
Are the applications open for public discussion? How does Average Joe contribute to that decision?
Solomon Islands.
I don't think of it as a slur. He's someone other than an employee at some department such as FDA or CDC. Average Joe has rights, but how does he get access to the process?
At what point do we say, "Nice try, a**holes, but we don't consent."
Bump 'em both. If they won't follow direction, they don't belong in the White House.
Yes, and I haven't seen anything about how to deal with a department in the constitution. And they have this nasty way of making regulation outside the constitutional processes.