my hope is kim jong un is horseback riding on snow capped mountaintops right now, gaining truths that will help all of mankind.
but odds are he's headed to his new pad in singapore with an even newer face.
It's over Christianity and it's a trial balloon.
Major banks already exclude anyone who was home schooled during the application process.
After they ban homeschooling as "dangerous to children", they will ban religious (they only care about stopping Christianity, not other religions) education of children just as China does already.
"Harvard Law Professor Wants To Ban Homeschooling For Being ‘Dangerous’ To Children And Society"
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/harvard-law-professor-wants-ban-homeschooling-dangerous-children-society/
"China’s War on Children: Youth Banned from All Religious Worship"
https://catholiccitizens.org/views/88976/yore-chinas-war-on-children-youth-banned-from-all-religious-worship/
>Harvard Law Professor Wants To Ban Homeschooling For Being ‘Dangerous’ To Children And Society"
>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/harvard-law-professor-wants-ban-homeschooling-dangerous-children-society/
What is it with Harvard professors and Chinese Military objectives?
"In China, they’re closing churches, jailing pastors – and even rewriting scripture"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/13/china-christians-religious-persecution-translation-bible
"China Forbids Children From Churches as Religious Rights Diminish"
https://www.opendoorsusa.org/christian-persecution/stories/china-forbids-children-from-churches-as-religious-rights-diminish/
"China: Children Cannot Become Christians until They Are 18"
https://www.christianheadlines.com/contributors/michael-foust/china-children-cannot-become-christians-until-they-are-18.html
Elizabeth Bartholet said Judtice Kavanaugh would destroy American democracy.
She's loudly against gun rights and international adoption from China too.
What's the deal with Harvard professors and China?
So you know, go ahead and take this crazy bitch seriously if you want.
"Kavanaugh will be ‘a disaster for the country’ if confirmed to the Supreme Court, says Harvard Law prof"
https://web.archive.org/web/20180711180123/https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/07/11/harvard-law-prof-kavanaugh-will-disaster-for-country-confirmed-supreme-court/cfiz0Edz4wmuqvft2aH76O/story.html
"Since President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court on Monday, a number of Harvard Law School faculty members and recent graduates have publicly praised the appellate judge for his intelligence and generosity during a 10-year stint as a visiting lecturer.
But at least one Harvard Law professor isn’t expecting good tidings if he’s ultimately confirmed to the high court.
“He will be a disaster for the country if confirmed,” said Elizabeth Bartholet, the Morris Wasserstein Public Interest Professor of Law at Harvard, in an e-mail Wednesday morning."
"Bartholet, a former lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and founder of the Legal Action Center in New York, stressed that she was basing her comments on Kavanaugh’s judicial record — not his time at Harvard. She was one of several Harvard Law professors whom the Globe reached out to for comment on Kavanaugh."
"Some key problems: His views on executive power threaten to undermine our democratic system and his views on 2nd amendment threaten attempts at reasonable gun regulation,” Bartholet wrote."
"She didn’t immediately respond to a follow-up e-mail asking whether she ever interacted at Harvard with Kavanaugh, who worked previously in the George W. Bush administration and also for independent counsel Ken Starr during the Bill Clinton investigation.
Conservative groups, meanwhile, have praised Kavanaugh.
Among his many boosters Tuesday was John Malcolm of the right-leaning Heritage Foundation."
Elizabeth Bartholet is also for stripping college students of their civil rights, including due process, when it gets in the way of Cultural Marxism, the religion of the elite.
"Harvard Law Professor: Feds’ Position on Sexual-Assault Policies Is ‘Madness’"
http://archive.is/Qk0Za (Wall Street Journal)
On Tuesday, the Department of Education said Harvard Law School’s current and past harassment policies and procedures didn’t comply with Title IX requirements, which bar gender discrimination at schools receiving federal financial aid.
The announcement marked the resolution a probe by the department’s Office for Civil Rights, which is investigating campus sexual-assault issues at dozens of schools, including Harvard’s undergraduate college.
While Harvard pledged to make changes, Elizabeth Bartholet, a veteran law professor at Harvard Law who teaches civil rights and family law, called the federal government’s recent campaign against colleges “madness” and said history would prove it wrong on the law. (Prof. Bartholet has been an outspoken opponent of policies that she and other law professors say strip students accused of sexual assault of their due-process rights.)
In an email to Law Blog on Wednesday, she wrote:
The federal government’s decision that Harvard Law School violated Title IX represents nothing more than the government’s flawed view of Title IX law. The Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, which issued the decision, is not the ultimate decision-maker on law. The courts are responsible for interpreting the law. And I trust that the courts will eventually reject the federal government’s current views. The courts’ decisions to date, including the U.S. Supreme Court, show a much more balanced approach to sexual harassment, one which recognizes the importance of vindicating the rights of those victimized by wrongful sexual misconduct, while at the same time protecting the rights of those wrongfully accused, and protecting the rights of individual autonomy in romantic relationships.
Prof. Bartholet said that Harvard University failed to challenge the government, and that other schools throughout the country need to show leadership by resisting the Department of Education’s position.
“I believe that history will demonstrate the federal government’s position to be wrong, that our society will look back on this time as a moment of madness, and that Harvard University will be deeply shamed at the role it played in simply caving to the government’s position,” she wrote.
A spokesman for the Department of Education declined to comment. Neither Harvard University nor Harvard Law School had an immediate comment.
search for links to china, clinton foundation or open society funding
a bit heavy on intl adoption topics and child advocacy