Whatever the name to each state's "Child Protective Services" my research has suggested that their real purpose is to traffic children from vulnerable families. I did a short dig on Harvard 's Elizabeth Bartholet and thought the headlines on the "Child Advocacy Program" she founded speak for themselves. Anyone seeking to ban homeschooling generally prefers state authority in the home over parental. How convenient if you regard children as a commodity.
Did anons figure this would happen? Everything MSM and "fake science" tells us is wrong, so wouldn't it make sense that a habit such as smoking which has been vilified for decades and forbidden everywhere in the US (practically) has at least some benefit. Unironically/ironically, opening "smoking sections" in restaurants might be a way to prevent coronavirus transmission inside buildings where people gather.
If natural infection does not result in immunity, then how would a useful vaccine be made?
I watched the first part of a talk she gave and I'd like to suggest she is Carholic in name only. She was trying to convince the audience that people in poor countries (translation: Africa and India, I think) need access to implantable birth control.
Pretty much what I was thinking. If a "coronavirus" vaccine is made, I'd guess it would be about something other than making one immune to "coronavirus". For some time now, I have believed (based on evidence) that the real purpose of the CDC vaccine pogrom is vastly different than stated.
We have been intentionally taught misleading at best versions of science, safe for public consumption. I don't think a virus is what we have been taught it is, I think the real agents of concern are bacterial/parasiric and I think the true bioweapon is injected.
I really think the synthetic Vitamin E was probably the issue.
Brilliant post. You pretty much also nailed why, from an MSM perspective, the "coronavirus" no matter how real or not the actual pathogen, is nothing more than a distraction.