Anonymous ID: bb5261 April 25, 2020, 7:25 a.m. No.8918477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8511

>>8918033

So sorry anon, must be devastating news. Have known several people with MS over the years, including my sister. The course can vary a lot; my college advisor had MS and is still teaching after over 20 years. My sister was mobile for about the same period although finally needing a wheelchair and assistance to do things.

Much more research is being done now than in earlier decades. And there are more treatment options available than before. Our prayers go out to you and your family, anon. WRWY.

Anonymous ID: bb5261 April 25, 2020, 7:35 a.m. No.8918542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8551 >>8609 >>8659 >>8766

>>8918379

baker/note collector:

feedback on >>8918038

NOT NOTABLE

 

to be notable anon analyses need at minimum:

  1. overall title or brief description

  2. specific info showing why it might be notable

either the poster or nommer can provide.

 

Must be good enough to allow baker to grasp the main idea within 15-20 seconds MAX.

 

Without this, NOT NOTABLE.

Anonymous ID: bb5261 April 25, 2020, 7:40 a.m. No.8918571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8626

>>8918551

baker can't look at posts with no title, description, tiny print, and very complicated relationships. The eyestrain alone is terrible and it's not baker's responsibility to translate from diagrams into words.

o7

Anonymous ID: bb5261 April 25, 2020, 7:54 a.m. No.8918654   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8662 >>8668

>>8918609

>like pepe care, already in notables

Each baker can make their own decisions about whether to include anon analyses in notes.

He can also ask anons for feedback.

But no baker is under obligation to consider posts for notables that lack fully adequate, easy-to-read descriptions from either the poster, the nommer, or both.