Anonymous ID: 5a12e1 April 25, 2020, 10:28 a.m. No.8919786   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9823 >>0285

>>8919322

Reconciling the Gateway Process, Prayer, Energetics, Quantum Physics

Have long sought a reconciliation between energetics (as a legitimate science of the mind and branch of quantum physics, resting on a substantial body of empirical evidence) versus some types of Christian theology that dismiss energetics as demonic or prohibited by God.

There need not be a duality between what is called 'prayer' and what is called 'energetics'. Those who believe God is the creator of the universe and everything in it, will call upon God, and ask His permission, when doing energetics visualizations. They may wish to call it prayer, which it is.

It strikes me that one purpose of the 'new age' 'ascension' 'raise your vibration' 'wilcock'-type stuff is to repel individuals who would otherwise look into this material and possibly practice it, by making it appear ridiculous, pagan, heathen, cultish, anti-Christian, etc. I paged through hundreds of 'energy healing' images and websites last night looking for any with which I could agree, and frankly most of them repelled me, and would repel others like me, even though many accurately diagrammed chakra locations, energy flows, and so forth. Yet in many instances they contain valid information or at least clues to things that have worked for some people.

Anons who have encountered tai chi, reiki healing, oriental internal-style martial arts, or similar practices have experienced the energy viscerally (if that's a word for perceiving specific energy flows in specific bodily sites). Yet they cannot prove what they subjectively experienced, even though it is powerful and repeatable and can often be commanded 'on call'.

There is a subjective factor in play here (again, supported by a theory of mind-as-quantum-physics). What a person believes matters. Energetics performed in a way that is consonant with one's core beliefs/faith will be more effective than something arbitrary or abstract or divorced from the cultural referents believed by multitudes of people.

There is still an issue of potential doxing if those with experience and background share their information.

We must find ways to share the information with one another without losing our direction or misleading those whose faith is not supported by a strong cornerstone foundation.

I believe we can pursue this in good conscience.

o7