Baker,
you took a post from namefagging clown A (CTA) to notables.
>>8922032 (lb) POTUS tweet dig: Interesting timing
please remove this as bakers and the notables should not help namefagging clowns to establish 'known' characters to shill with later.
no anon namefags and namefagging clowns are never notable.
Baker,
this is a board for anons. that is why everyone´s posts have "Anonymous" as name.
it´s not only common standard and strongly disagreed with by anons and Q to namefag, it´s only used by clowns - and clowns using this is obvious af.
no anon uses a name to spread info. bc indeed it´s the info itself that counts. (clown 'A' posts bs info anyway, just like E and ETS it´s info that had been seen by anons for a couple of breads…)
no anon namefags.
when clowns use a name over and over and over again, this is only done for one reason: clowns want to establish 'known and trustworthy' characters here, to shill with later.
obviously this was and is done since two years now and clowns that tried to create known namefags failed bigly.
CTA was ridiculed. McT was ridiculed. And now A is ridiculed in the same way.
However, since a couple of weeks, this glowing namefag clown A (CTA) is baked frequently.
(obviously this is done bc A is not considered an anon by anons. obviusly this is a desperate move to help push him bc he fails.)
namefagging clowns have never been baked. and it should not be done by you.
so a muh jew propaganda clown backs up the baker?
and your best argument for namefagging clowns like A (CTA) baked is that Q uses a tripcode and name??
namefags are ridiculed by anons on a board for anon. common standard. common sense.
why would some IDs namefag anyway, knowing this makes them glow?
why were there hundreds of posts signed by CTA in the past? did clowns try to establish 'known' characters? is that why CTA disappeared for months and then came back a couple of times for a few breads, disappearing quickly again?
coincidence that after this and other namefags had failed, bc this is a board for anons, that an ID with name "A" showed up, posting 'digs' (connections that had already been made by anons in almost all cases)?
coincidence that namefagging clown failed bigly and now get´s baked with bs every other bread?
and baker has no argument at all but instead chooses to express his amusement over clowns being baked by him?