>>8924244 lb
I know and I understand why you do, but it's always a little surprising to me. A nice surprise, to be sure :)
>>8924271 lb
c) actually schizophrenic
No, someone who is on drugs. Not everyone here does drugs.
Reminds me of when "anons" mobbed the woman on POTUS' reelection campaign Jesse something-or-other. Mindlessly stupidly aggressive and 100% counterproductive, just because she is skeptical of Q. Some people have the mindset of 12 year olds and behave just like a leftist mob, which is not that surprising since many of us came over from /pol/ but holy shit many don't behave like adults and it actually hurts the movement, but they don't think things through.
It's frustrating.
Thank you for the reply.
>tor is down, strange
There's all sorts of strangeness right now, updates are super extra laggy on clearnet rn…can't even scroll or type when updating. Makes replying in a timely manner (same thread) difficult.
Since I don't have all the previous posts and no one has posted them, could you give a brief synopsis of your objective?
>UNDERSTAND YOUR ENEMY. Most anons do not know. Without Knowing You will Never Win.
This to me is the most important thing and I find the most curious.
1- implies that who the majority of anons think of is the enemy is not (entirely different group/entity or of an entirely different nature)
-or-
understanding of that enemy is incorrect
2- I note your initial capitals in the last sentence, for no other reason than autism and lulz
3- there is a difference between knowing/understanding the GAME and knowing/understanding the PLAYERS
also-
difference between 'connecting dots' and understanding the players AND the game, with the greater perspective that gives, and higher chance of success.
So, considering that the basic consensus of 'the enemy' is a cabal that is multi-national or supranational, multi-generational, intentionally evil or at least criminally amoral, either one or several of those things are incorrect.
Since accuracy is important that seems to be the most important thing to clarify and understand.
Are you able to assist in that?
There are many on night shift who do drugs and state it openly. It's not an assertion or a secret, people are quite open about it, so observing that and responding to something from someone who is clearly high is really not spoopy. Unless you're high, then I guess it might be spoopy and cause some paranoia. But drugs do that.
You've got to have rhino skin to be here in the sausage grinder. That I have, but maturity and perspective are important, too and mobbing people who think differently, or don't wholeheartedly believe in Q or vulnerable, like the lady you told about, is idiocy and counterproductive. I tend to think that the ones who do that are not really anons, but "anons" considering EVERY ABC monitors and posts here, has operatives on social media, it is common sense that they would do those things, and encourage the weaker of mind here to do it with them.
>Is the moon the source of our problems?
Is that something someone who is high would say?
Is that something someone who is not high would say?
Basic logic isn't shocking.
>>8924559
>Nope
To which part?
Thank you, enjoy the buffet, I'll be here all week.
>>8924676
Oh, derp
Why would it be insulting to state facts, like there are anons on here who do drugs (and say so), who post when high and that post sounded like the anon was high? Have you never been around people on drugs before? Usually the love their drugs but also get really defensive about it. You seem quite defensive about this, though there is no reason to be, and that has a lot more to do with you than me.
Thank you for taking the time to answer. In digesting this, the immediate takeaway is, as Actors in The Game, DO something local to affect local (in meatspace) to become the news, also do the reporting that mockingbirds won't do (in web and/or meatspace) to become the news. This, instead of just aggregating things we are important for ourselves & others (+ normies) for our own notable aggregator sites (wearethene.ws et al).
>Now is the time to READ Q's drops as novel
As a novel, I will do that. I have an inkling the beginning drops were the end of the show, as others have.
I have also never figured out the difference between hypen and underscore
re-read vs re_read
or figured out the movie signature references. Yet.
Thank you again.
Assumptions, assumptions along with defensiveness for no real reason. There is no need to be defensive, I'm not attacking you or anyone.
All of your assumptions are incorrect.
Was this the document that was posted in a prior thread?
>fm 33-5 psychological warfare in combat operations
Humble enough to admit I walked right into that one.