>>8928162 (lb)

>>8928203 (lb)

Roger that. Over the target. Fuck off nigger.

>>8928206 (lb)

Anon led 50K strong Harm Reduction pro Vape coalition for 5years. Extensive research was done on the history prior to Q involvment.

https://www.vaporlounge.com/Thin-High-Pg-E-Liquid-s/307.htm

PG vs. VG E-Liquid - Which Is a Better Choice?

When it comes to selecting e-liquid, there are two main components to choose from, propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG), and each one is formulated differently. Choosing the appropriate e-cigarette setup to suit your lifestyle requires the right formula in order to achieve the best performance and flavor, as each has its own unique characteristics.

Propylene Glycol (PG)

Propylene glycol, an organic compound that comes from propylene oxide, is recognized as safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and was used by the military in WW2 to purify the air. Today, it is commonly used in solvents, humectants, food preservatives, tobacco products, pharmaceuticals and, of course, e-liquid.

Vegetable Glycerin (VG)

Vegetable glycerin is also considered safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and is an all-natural liquid typically extracted from plant oils. It’s used in everything from cosmetic products to food production and e-juice.

http://blog.vaporlounge.com/2017/11/propylene-glycol-vs-vegetable-glycerin.html

Attached - MSDS for Rosco Fog Machine Fluid - Aqueous Glycol Solution

>>8928348

Nice Hog. Can we go for a ride?

>>8928396

5% Diacetyl in a 40/60 PG/VG blend is a lovely buttery delicious vape. The risk comes at higher concentrations, like the popcorn factory workers were in 8hrs/day for 20 years. I've had one respiratory illness in 7 years since switching.

—–

As active ingredients, propylene glycol and dipropylene glycol are formulated primarily as pressurized liquids and ready-to-use solutions. Propylene glycol is used in air sanitization and hard surface disinfection and dipropylene glycol is used in air sanitization. Pest (fleas, mites, red lice, and various bacteria and viruses) control for pets (cats, dogs, and birds) is also a major active use for propylene glycol. As an inert ingredient, propylene glycol is formulated into end-use agricultural and antimicrobial pesticide products whereas dipropylene glycol is formulated into pesticide products for use in agricultural settings. Products containing propylene glycol and dipropylene glycol in combination with other active ingredients will be reregistered only when all of the active ingredients have been determined to be eligible for reregistration. This document addresses the exposures and risks from the use of these pesticides as both active and inert ingredients in pesticide products. The Agency has concluded that the FQPA Safety Factor for propylene glycol and dipropylene glycol should be removed (equivalent to 1X) because there is no pre- or post-natal evidence of increased susceptibility for infants and children following exposure to either propylene or dipropylene glycol.

https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_G-72_1-Sep-04.pdf

>>8928332

Sauce

https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/Volume_02b.pdf

Begin p. 469 (16-3)

>>8928508

I can read just fine. It was only removed for retail sales. Delicious, safe to vape, e-liquids containing low levels of Diacetyl are still available for the connoisseur.

Laywers, insurance companies and gov't bureaucracies ruin everything.

>>8928542

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330075659_Extraction_of_Nicotine_3-1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl_pyridine_from_Tobacco_Leaves_Separated_from_Gold_Live_Classic_BrandTM_Cigarettes_by_Solvent_Extraction_Approach_and_Characterization_Via_IR_Analysis

POTUS Features Amazing New Room "Sterilant" technology at Whitehouse

Invented by Nasa for the MARS rover

Space age technology

https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1254249626707861505

>>8928759

I wonder how much they'll charge "We the People" for this "Groundbreaking Invention"…

>>8928823

Glad anon pointed that out.

Because he's knows it's $0.30 of Fog Juice in a $30 party machine.

>>8928823

muh Magic

>>8928847

Fuck the 'rona

>>8928907

Even simpler.

Completely simple. That's also the process for "sterilizing" medical/dental cotton, and the cotton vapers use to build their RTAs.

It leaves zero residue.

>>8928907

Peroxide is also considered a bleach.

This is the right track.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peroxide-based_bleach

>>8928907

https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/environmental-hygiene/fast-track-zero-environmental-pathogens-using-novel-ionized-hydrogen-peroxide

A Fast Track to Zero Environmental Pathogens Using Novel Ionized Hydrogen Peroxide Technology

February 1, 2011

Room disinfection using hydrogen peroxide (HP) "fogging" methods has been shown to eradicate or significantly reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),1-2 Clostridium difficile (C. diff),3-4 vancomycin-resistent Enterococci (VRE),5 and Acinetobacter baumanni6 in healthcare settings. These fogging methods include "dry gas,"2 "dry mist,"4 "microcondensation,"1, 3, 5 and "activated,"6 also known as ionized hydrogen peroxide (iHP). Hydrogen peroxide (HP) fogging decontamination has recently gained notice in healthcare institutions due to its many benefits such as superior efficacy, safety and materials compatibility. HP fogging can be an essential intervention to rapidly reduce transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens.10 One hospital study reports a 53 percent reduction of hospital-wide incidence of C. diff using HP fogging.3

Despite the benefits of HP fogging, its use has been limited to isolated outbreaks and not widely adopted for routine disinfection of patient care areas. One reason is that CDC guidelines recommend against using disinfectant fogging methods.7-8 However, these guidelines contemplated fogging using quaternary ammonia, phenolics, formaldehyde, hypochlorite solutions or other disinfectants that are harmful, not effective, and/or impractical for healthcare environments.9 Additionally, long process times, cost of equipment and inconvenient operation have been barriers.15

The prevailing approach for reducing environmental surface pathogens is programmatic manual cleaning focused on high-touch surfaces, but this approach has practical challenges as well:

• Not all environmental surfaces are targeted, and even cleaning of high-touch surfaces is susceptible to human error. Interventions not effectively targeting all environmental surfaces leave reservoirs of pathogens.17

• Training and oversight in an increasingly overburdened, under-resourced work environment may prove daunting and difficult to sustain. Low hand hygiene compliance is a current example of just how difficult. One study reports only a 50 percent compliance rate in the U.S. even after years of publicity, education, training, product innovations and other efforts.18

• There is no data showing the impact of cleaner surfaces to environmental pathogen levels or their transmission.11-12

• There is no cost-benefit analysis showing the financial value of programmatic manual cleaning.

As HP fogging leaves virtually no reservoir of pathogens on treated surfaces, and as equipment and processes are optimized for faster process times, reduced disruption and lower-cost, broad adoption as a valued intervention will follow.

–MORE–