So the timelines are a little off as Ceasarian was born in 47BC which would have made him in his 70s during the time of Jesus ministry. But if we can look past that, it's kindof amazing to think about.

>In 34 BC, Antony granted further eastern lands and titles to Caesarion and to his own three children with Cleopatra in the Donations of Alexandria. Caesarion was proclaimed to be a god, a son of [a] god, and "King of Kings". This grandiose title was "unprecedented in the management of Roman client-king relationships" and could be seen as "threatening the 'greatness' of the Roman people". Antony also declared Caesarion to be Caesar's true son and heir. This declaration was a direct threat to Octavian (whose claim to power was based on his status as Julius Caesar's grandnephew and adopted son). These proclamations partly caused the fatal breach in Antony's relations with Octavian, who used Roman resentment over the Donations to gain support for war against Antony and Cleopatra.

1) Earliest christian imagery of Jesus was clean cut roman looking and handsome.

2) Do these paintings not look JUST like the bust of Ceasarian? DO THEY?

3) Ceasarian was "King of Kings"

4) Antony considered Ceasarian the true successor to Julius, this would make Octavian pretty eager to destroy him.

Isn't it interesting that the Egyptian Empire falls, The Roman Empire Rises, and the seeds of the Christian Empire are born all at the exact same time?

Why is this relevant to Q?

Think bloodlines.

>>893562

>>893645

No worries. I'm most fascinated by Q because of its implications on history so that's the angle I've been digging at.

I'm going to talk out of my ass and see if any of it makes sense…

This is the secret of the secret societies. Christianity isn't a negation of egyptian mythology. The popular version hides its roots, but in reality Christ was a Pharoah and of the same 'cult' as Akhenaten. This is why the Pope can embrace all sorts of pagan Egyptian crap and not be a hypocrite.This is what the Templars found evidence for at the Temple of Solomon and blackmailed the Pope to expose.

For religious people, this doesn't mean you're fucked. Gnosis never required Jesus, it was always about Christ consciousness. Truth is that Christianity as we know it is the Roman government codified into a religion, thanks to Constatine.

Here's the timeline:

3300BC to 30BC Egypt Empire

3 years later

27BC to 476CE Roman Empire

0??AD to 325AD Christianity before the Canon, free religion

366AD First Pope as we know them.

See how these dates seem to play off each other?

Egypt falls, Rome picks it up, Rome is falling, Christianity picks it up.

There's something big going on here. And it's still going on.

>>893650

>>893704

I'm following up on some research first posited by another anon on here that P is Pharaoh. This led me down a deep rabbit hole. Which lead me to Cleopatra and Julius Ceaser's son. Which looked familiar. So I dug up the earliest known depictions of Jesus. And I'm floored.

>>893766

I admit it's wild. But can you look at that pic and not say it's uncanny? Jesus didn't get a beard until many centuries later (I guess it takes awhile for roman facial hair to grow?)

>>893784

how is that blasphemy? are you saying that the earliest depictions of Jesus DON'T look like the Last Pharoah of Egypt?

>>893738

first of all, I fucked up. That bust is of Octavian. Oops. Here's Ceasarion instead, and it's actually a much better match.

>>893833

First off I don't know if I believe the Shroud at all.

Second, even if the Shroud is real it doesn't mean Jesus was usually clean shaven but grew a beard while in prison waiting for execution.

Darwin was clean shaven.

>>893860

After the defeat of Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, Cleopatra seems to have groomed Caesarion to take over as "sole ruler without his mother."[1] She may have intended to go into exile, perhaps with Antony, who may have hoped that he would be allowed to retire as Lepidus had. Caesarion reappears in the historical record in 30 BC, when Octavian invaded Egypt and searched for him. Cleopatra may have sent Caesarion, at the time 17 years old, to the Red Sea port of Berenice for safety, possibly as part of plans for an escape to India; he may have been sent years earlier, but the sources are unclear. Plutarch does say that Caesarion was sent to India, but also that he was lured back by false promises of the kingdom of Egypt:

Caesarion, who was said to be Cleopatra's son by Julius Caesar, was sent by his mother, with much treasure, into India, by way of Ethiopia. There Rhodon, another tutor like Theodorus, persuaded him to go back, on the ground that [Octavian] Caesar invited him to take the kingdom.[9]

>>893907

I couldn't help but notice that Octavian (who became Augustus) is a lot like Octagon

>>893911

Fair enough I'll check it out.

Still doesn't mean he wasn't growing out a beard during his trials and later life. His ministry may have been beardless.

>>893906

Calm down fool.

I'm just showing that most people think of Darwin as bearded but he only had a beard in his last moments of life.

>>894110

Is there some sort of clever connection between Main Stream Media and MS[13=M]? Or is that just a coincidence?

>>894135

You don't know shit about history. God made us brave and unafraid of exploring any idea.

Q

Do Pharaoh bloodlines have anything to do with all of this?