>>8935290 (pb)
>Formaldehyde is diluted during the vaccine manufacturing process, but residual quantities of formaldehyde may be found in some current vaccines.
that sentence makes 0 sense
100% doublespeak
almost like fauci himself wrote it
“I was delivering prescriptions from the time I was old enough to ride a bike,” Fauci recalls.
https://www.holycross.edu/departments/publicaffairs/hcm/2002_03Summer.pdf
Awards and Honors
✰ Dr. Fauci received the Frank Annunzio Award in the Humanitarian Field in 2001. Announced by the Christopher Columbus Fellowship Foundation, an independent federal government agency, the Award is presented annually to those individuals whose research has “led to creative work, process, product or other achievement that has had a significant and ben- eficial impact on society.”
✰ Dr. Fauci has received 24 honorary doctorates for his scientific accomplishments from universities in the United States and abroad.
✰ In the years between 1981 and 1994, Dr. Fauci was the fifth most cited scientist—out of more than
1 million scientists worldwide that had published during the 13-year period.
✰ In 1985, the members of the Stanford University Arthritis Center Survey of the American Rheumatism Association agreed that Dr. Fauci’s work on the treat- ment of polyarteritis nodosa and Wegener’s granulo- matosis was one of the most significant developments in patient management of rheumatology in the past 20 years.
✰ In March of 2002, Dr. Fauci was presented with the $500,000 Albany Medical Center Prize in Medicine and Biomedical Research. The annual award, made possible by a $50 million gift from a New York busi- nessman, recognizes outstanding contributions to “improving health care and promoting biomedical research,” as well as dedication to patient care.
✰ Dr. Fauci has written and edited more than 1,000 scientific publications.
he's been carrying poison's water for decades
and paid well for it
fuck fauci
use the bat
from the article:
“That began a relationship over many years that allowed me to walk amongst them,” Fauci says. “It was really interesting; they let me into their camp. I went to the gay bath houses and spoke to them. I went to San Francisco, to the Castro District, and I discussed the problems they were having, the degree of suffering that was going on in the community, the need for them to get involved in clinical trials, since there were no other possibilities for them to get access to drugs. And I earned their confidence.”
fuaci
>I went to the gay bathhouses
homo confirmed
and look at this gem:
When asked who his personal heroes were at the October 1988 presidential debate, George Bush replied, “I think of Dr. Fauci. You’ve probably never heard of him. He’s a very fine researcher—a top doctor at the National Institutes of Health—working hard, doing something about research on this disease of AIDS.”
https://www.holycross.edu/departments/publicaffairs/hcm/2002_03Summer.pdf
fuckface was bush's hero in 1988
how is this fuck not arrested
obvious plant to spread aids by a genocidal regime
those you trust the most indeed
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4726684/user-clip-larry-kramer-calls-tony-fauci
this article is a gold fucking mine
these guys don't look like pedos at all…
so much digging to do so little time
question:
why is it the entire world has to stay home for a cold, that may result in murder by intubation, or be called murder, while murderous perverts with bad intentions can "poz" victims intentionally with AIDS gizz with impunity and legal protections. What do both situations have in common?
(fauc)
mistake how?
his dad was a pharmacist
strange
pretty hard to miss fauci's background
especially with the NSA in your office upon request
https://norml.org/news/2020/04/23/review-cannabis-smoke-exposure-is-distinct-from-tobacco-not-associated-with-copd-or-lung-cancer
Main » News Releases » Location » New Zealand » Review: Cannabis Smoke Exposure Is "Distinct from Tobacco," Not Associated with COPD or Lung Cancer
Review: Cannabis Smoke Exposure Is "Distinct from Tobacco," Not Associated with COPD or Lung Cancer
Thursday, 23 April 2020
Dunedin, New Zealand: Cannabis exposure does not negatively impact the lungs in a manner consistent with tobacco, nor is it similarly linked to elevated rates of either COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or lung cancer, according a literature review published in the journal Addiction.
A team of New Zealand researchers reviewed clinical trial data assessing the impact of cannabis smoke exposure on the lungs. They report that "the effects of smoking cannabis on the lungs are distinct from tobacco."
Specifically, they write: "[I]t has been pragmatic to assume that cannabis and tobacco would have similar respiratory effects. … The research that has been done, however, offers a different story. The most common serious respiratory consequences from smoking tobacco are Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and lung cancer. Epidemiological evidence that smoking cannabis causes either of these is scant."
By contrast, authors reported that cannabis smoke exposure is associated with higher rates of cough, sputum production, and chronic bronchitis.
They reported "little epidemiological evidence of an association between cannabis and emphysema," and found conflicting evidence with respect to whether marijuana smoke exposure is associated with an increased risk of pneumonia.
Their findings are consistent with those of other literature reviews, such as those here and here.
Full text of the study, "Cannabis use disorder and the lungs," appears in Addiction. Additional information is available in the NORML fact-sheet, 'Cannabis Exposure and Lung Health."
they give awards to comped assholes in his name
dig
vannevar bush is notably fake and gay
they mostly give the mad bomber award to highly placed envirofacists
Vannevar Bush Award
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Vannevar Bush
The National Science Board established the Vannevar Bush Award (/væˈniːvər/ van-NEE-vər) in 1980 to honor Vannevar Bush's unique contributions to public service. The annual award recognizes an individual who, through public service activities in science and technology, has made an outstanding "contribution toward the welfare of mankind and the Nation." The recipient of the award receives a bronze medal struck in the memory of Dr. Bush.
Vannevar Bush (1890–1974) was a prominent scientist, adviser to US presidents, and the force behind the establishment of the National Science Foundation. In 1945, at the request of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, he wrote a famous essay entitled Science, the Endless Frontier which recommended that a foundation be established by the United States Congress to serve as a focal point for the USA Federal Government's support and encouragement of research and education in science and technology as well as the development of a national science policy. The legislation creating the National Science Foundation was signed by president Harry S. Truman on May 10, 1950.
List of winners[edit]
Source: National Science Board
1980 – James R. Killian, Jr.
1981 – William O. Baker
1982 – Lee A. DuBridge
1983 – Frederick Seitz
1984 – Roger R. Revelle
1985 – Hans A. Bethe
1986 – I. I. Rabi
1987 – David Packard
1988 – Glenn T. Seaborg
1989 – Linus Pauling
1990 – no award
1991 – James A. Van Allen
1992 – Jerome B. Wiesner
1993 – Norman Hackerman
1994 – Frank Press
1995 – Norman F. Ramsey, Jr.
1996 – Philip H. Abelson
1997 – H. Guyford Stever
1998 – Robert M. White
1999 – Maxine Frank Singer
2000 – Herbert F. York and Norman Borlaug
2001 – Harold Varmus and Lewis M. Branscomb
2002 – Erich Bloch
2003 – Richard C. Atkinson
2004 – Mary L. Good
2005 – Robert W. Galvin
2006 – Charles H. Townes and Raj Reddy
2007 – Shirley Ann Jackson
2008 – Norman Augustine
2009 – Mildred Dresselhaus
2010 – Bruce M. Alberts
2011 – Charles M. Vest
2012 – Leon M. Lederman
2013 – Neal F. Lane
2014 – Richard Tapia
2015 – James J. Duderstadt
2016 – Robert J. Birgeneau
2017 – Rita R. Colwell
2018 – Jane Lubchenco
http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2011/12/05/origins-of-the-nuclear-black-budget/
All of this invokes for me the initial big, black budget request of the Manhattan Project. It was one of the earliest invocations of unusual secrecy in the project, as well. Vannevar Bush wrote to President Roosevelt at the end of 1942, telling him that accelerating the “special project” from a feasibility study (can a bomb be built?) to a development program (actually making a bomb) would cost $400 million (1942 dollars; between $5 and $10 billion today depending on how you calculate it).1
Bush’s exact language to Roosevelt was as follows:
Especially we need our instructions as to whether this program is to be vigorously pushed through. It would be ruinous to the essential secrecy to have to defend before an appropriations committee any request for funds for this project and it is therefore recommended that some time in the spring you request the Congress for the needed funds ($315,000,000 [in additional to what had already been allocated]); such funds to be expended at your discretion.
In other words, if you want the bomb, you’ve got to pay. If you want to pay, you’ve got to do it from secret funds. Roosevelt of course agreed. He was the one who had requested that the bomb be kept ultra-secret to begin with — explicitly far more secret than any other military project.
Take a look at that one more time. Who is the secrecy keeping the information from? Congress. Why? Because if you’ve decided you need to keep the bomb project a secret from Germany, then you can’t have Congress poking around in it, because Congress is traditionally as leaky as a sieve. Other correspondence shows that Bush was particularly afraid that no appropriations committee would ever be able to understand that the atomic bomb was not just science fiction, and was a worthwhile gamble. (And he was probably right — it was not a conservative approach to fighting the war at all.)
So there we go down the secrecy rabbit hole — our fear of the enemy (the Nazis) leading to secrets being kept from our own agencies of oversight (Congress, much less “the public”). When the fact that there is a secret is also itself a secret, this sort of dynamic played out again and again.
Bush and Roosevelt eventually did let a handful of Congressmen in on the secret, just to grease the budget procedures. They did not include Senator Harry Truman, who spent years trying to audit the Manhattan Project before becoming Vice President. Truman did, however, come to some understanding of the goal of the project, and, as David McCullough points out in his biography of him, did actually leak it to a constituent. So perhaps Bush and Roosevelt’s fear of Congressional leaking was justified.
Interestingly, Bush’s $400 million estimate for the atomic bomb was off by quite a lot. The final cost of the Manhattan Project was around $2 billion (1945 dollars, $20-40 billion current dollars)… in other words, around five times the initial estimate. Sound familiar? That’s almost the same factor of budget overruns cited by POGO. So while some things change — less secrecy around the bomb budget — some things stay the same.
the noose tightens
gonna be a big week