>>8935644LB

Don't believe it will be possible for Gen. Flynn to be DNI or otherwise involved in intel until cleansing has occurred or is well underway.

Flynn as DNI would be awesome, and I have a good degree of confidence it will eventually happen. However, placing Flynn as DNI too soon would open a Pandora's box of bullshit retaliation lawsuits that would bog the gov't down and end up with a fuckton of long-running, have-to-keep-it-under-seal crap that will hinder if not outright derail the cleaning the IC so desperately needs.

Adm. Rogers is undoubtedly the main witness in the FISA and FISA-related crap (LL tarmac, Clinton linkage to SR 187, etc), but the lawsuits that Flynn's housecleaning would prompt do not have to be related to anything on-going. They just have to gum up the works until 2025.

Can you imagine Flynn as DNI and Rogers in a related role? Our IC would actually work for US for a change, and work well.

>>8936256

Fuck. That.

>>8936322

Yes, but anons opining LB that the next DNI is Flynn seems unlikely for the reasons I posted.

No issues with Grennell being DNI for a while. He's doing the right thing and who gives a shit about an Ambassadorship to Germany anyway? It's like having an ambassadorship to Jamaica - pointless unless you actually like the cuisine.