>>8942222 <--- quads lb

I am not alone in this then. But those exercises I posted I found helpful in changing thought process to look at Q posts differently than I normally would.

As for confirmations, that's tricky, too, since all the ABCs monitor and post (as well as [them]) so I can understand when confirmation can't be made outright because it would tipoff targets or otherwise compromise a mission, etc.. It's still frustrating to not know if the direction is correct, since if at a point in a larger analysis one assumption/understanding is incorrect, all that follows from it building upon it will necessarily be incorrect as well.

But this is why we (anons) have to work together on this and each person's experience, knowledgebase and skills can help refine the thinking. Unfortunately there is more shitposting that thinking and refining at the moment, but I'm glad always, to see a fellow thinker.

>>8942275 lb

>What happened to X?

>What really happened to X?

I take that to mean the official story vs what really happened, and we must be able to find the real story (or close to it) via open sources that will demolish the official story. So it is a prompt to look further and not accept what is given at face value on an incident.

>>8942352

I speak for no one but myself, (am the 1st post you tagged from lb) but Q did say specifically that we anons have to do the research & learn, and tasked us also to create graphics to calm and educate the public during and after the Storm. So that seems to fit what you have questioned - and if you remember very early on some MILINT anons came in the 4/pol/ threads and chimed in, even posting part of a dissertation on Memetics, specifically in a military context.

What is made and works on anons here would be of a different character than what would/will work on normies, and their varying levels of awareness, biases, age, etc. I think we have had some really good successes and some failures, too, in that regard. Without some direction and especially with no feedback from those who post our graphics, and our original War Room lady being MIA, we're struggling a bit right now. With that said, it will get harder since @ssholeJack is going crazy with the b& hammer today.

>>8942785

Your baby talk ebonics and calling yourself or others 'pepe' gives you away no matter how many times you hope IPs, I don't care what your obsession is, but you're really noticeable. j/s

>>8942844

oh sorry :)

>>8942900

I think we did with original WR lady, she had help in there and during the 'release the memo' campaign, she would give us feedback that her helpers noticed, and some anons who were dropping the memes would chime in, too, letting us know the responses were good on something or not. It went really fast in those days, wild times.

I have a better memetic manual that I'll upload and post next thread (too big a file for here, it's a pdf).