>>8947035 lb
Thank you for explaining what was posted.
>leadership has the chance, at the podium, daily, to directly address it and, well, everything else, and refuses to
I'm not sure what you're listening to, but I do hear POTUS talking about it, repeatedly, and just the other day (or last few days, it was in notables) POTUS appointed about 5 people to a Human Trafficking commission. POTUS may not dwell on it for long in the CV briefings but I've caught mentions of it about 6 times so far, and that's just in the CV briefings.
>>8947036 lb
I have no doubt though that drugs are sold in a lot of salons, and "massages" may have "happy endings" also.
Someone who was a "nail technician" explained to me once that the strong smell emanating from the cheap nail shops run by Orientals is a very cheap version of a chemical used to 'set' the acrylic nails. She said that they are supposed to use the (far more expensive) chemical, which is the same as dentists use to cure the composite fillings with UV light, but they skimp and use this other chemical. That cheaper chemical is known to be very, very carcinogenic both to the person applying it (the people working in a salon that uses it) and the person it's used on (all those women getting cheap acrylic nails). She pointed out that all the nail technicians wear surgical masks and periodically put some strong-smelling oil under their nose (above upper lip) because the cheap chemical smells so awful and they are so close to it all day.
I peeked into one as I was walking by in a strip mall once, and smelled that odor myself, and they were all wearing masks.
So some people who are not visiting hair/nail salons are not getting their dose of these noxious chemicals and those applying them are not either, which is good for them.