This is bullshit jackass, there is no chem you fuck wad idiot, you know nothing about aerodynamics if you think this shit is real.
You need to add "Muh Chemtrails" to the shill-a-thon meter, it's getting old
Listen for the brain impaired, I didn't say it hasn't been tested, we test nuke too but they are not exploding over Los Angeles and either is chem, they don't spray chem from aircraft engines, only a stupid fuck would think that. Yes lets ruin this multi million dollar jets engines to kill people.
Ok then planefag me some right now? Everyone talks about the contrails so they are idiots, just show me some on radar that are non-commercial flights.
Having a good laugh, if you think that Kansas made Beechcraft King Air can hold a cabin of chem bigger than a couple kegs of beer you're crazy, let alone the BS picture is interfering with the flaps and ailerons so that baby isn't going to be taking off with that on, I'm guessing that is a smoke producer so that they can see the wake turbulence being produced from the blades over the nacelle.
Exactly, for testing propellers and the shape of the engine pod without a wind tunnel. I am sick of the people pushing every weight and balance picture as chem. There are real threats to our lives.
No look at the picture, I fly planes and gliders, we have gust locks on gliders. That strap is over the top of the port aileron, that flaps would work fine as they only go down probably 30 deg on a turbine (40 on a 150) so that shows this is for ground testing only.
I'm not saying burning Jet A is clean, they don't put catalytic converters on jets, they don't do any smogging on them at all so you are getting burnt and unburned carbons and chemicals from the fuel and probably worse during lading when the engines are lower thrust but there are not enough planes doing this and they would have to zig zag over your house so snopes says your claim is "PROBBLY FALSE"