Top Trump policy adviser Joe Grogan to leave post

Joe Grogan, head of the White House Domestic Policy Council, intends to leave his position at the end of May. A White House official confirmed Grogan’s planned departure, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal. Grogan told the Journal that he was leaving the White House on good terms with President Trump and that he planned to leave the position on May 24, having stayed in the role longer than he anticipated. Grogan’s departure had been rumored as a possibility for weeks, particularly following the arrival of Mark Meadows, a former North Carolina congressman, as Trump’s fourth chief of staff. “I had a great conversation with the president and a great conversation with Meadows,” Grogan told the Journal in an interview published Wednesday evening.

Grogan has served as the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council since February 2019, overseeing a broad array of policy issues including health care and regulation. Before that, he worked as a top health care official in the Office of Management and Budget beginning in 2017 and was a close ally of Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s third chief of staff, whom Meadows replaced in March. Grogan worked as a lobbyist for drug company Gilead Sciences before joining the Trump administration. Grogan’s departure marks the latest staffing change at the White House amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump replaced press secretary Stephanie Grisham with Kayleigh McEnany, a top campaign spokeswoman, earlier this month as part of a broader makeover of the communications team executed by Meadows. Grogan was one of the original members of the White House coronavirus task force launched in late January. It was not immediately clear who would replace him as head of the Domestic Policy Council.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/495385-top-trump-policy-adviser-joe-grogan-to-leave-post

>>8968827

>DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER in block 4 in #11479.

There's a there here:

District of Columbia v. Heller

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias. Because of the District of Columbia's status as a federal enclave (it is not in any state), the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states. This point was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), in which it was found that they are.

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed by a vote of 5 to 4 the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Heller v. District of Columbia. The Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment, found that the Regulations Act was an unconstitutional ban, and struck down the portion of the Regulations Act that requires all firearms including rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock". Prior to this decision the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 also restricted residents from owning handguns except for those registered prior to 1975.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

>>8968913

What Pharma company was Fauci pushing today…Gilead! He bad!

he worked as a top health care official in the Office of Management and Budget beginning in 2017 and was a close ally of Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s third chief of staff, whom Meadows replaced in March. Grogan worked as a lobbyist for drug company Gilead Sciences before joining the Trump administration.

>>8968986

Interesting…and then we have this guy..who was a lobbyist for Gilead leaving his post in the White House on May 24th.

see: >>8968879 Connection?

Not sure if anyone caught this during POTUS presser today, the discussion moved toward the Navy Officer who wrote letters while his ship had been infected with Coronavirus, I can remember all of what he said, but he did state: He shouldn't have been penning letters like Earnest Hemingway..2x's What was the message?

>>8969164

Hmm..who could that be pointing to, Who is EH?

>>8969171

Ah..forgot about him..Thanks Anon..time to see what he's been up to.

>>8969173

Thanks brain fart., kek

>>8969186

Makes perfect sense! Thank you anon!