>>8970065

I have no idea what portion of these oh so clever "anti-Jew" posts are actually posted by Q team in order to disgust Anons.

Yes, a higher than random number of the extreme evildoers proclaim they are "Jews".

But does evil have ANYTHING do do with biology?

Does evil have ANYTHING to do with being raised in a particular cultural or historical setting?

Or does evil have to do with the choices we make as INDIVIDUALS?

The facts that shape our own particular existence serve to shape the particular choices that we must each make, and no one faces exactly the same choices… but we each face our OWN choices.

>>8970170

Anyone, of any biological or cultural background, is going to be inclined towards certain vices more than others, in virtue of that background. And they'll find certain virtues "easier" than others. But ultimately it depends on the individual to avoid the easy vices….

For instance… a man naturally large and strong will find physical courage easier than others… and that's good in itself… but physical courage, like other virtues matters to everyone. Maybe this big dude takes it easy and fails to develop his natural talents, while another "weaker" man (or woman) strives to become physically strong.

Biology and upbringing give us inclinations, but we make the choices as individuals.

(Of course, this doesn't meant that we should ignore biology and the shaping of culture… it matters greatly! But the rights and wrongs of your forebears are not passed on to you…)

>>8970221

>Ignoring patterns of behavior is not enlightenment.

Fully agree. Nothing I say hinges on that. On the contrary, you will be more enlightened (I think) the more you pay attention to any patterns.

My personal judgments on who to welcome into my home have nothing to do with "God's eye" judgments regarding good and evil.

Think about a conventional war. You try to kill the dudes wearing the enemy uniform and defend those with your uniform. Does that mean you think they are truly evil? I hope not, and most people get that today. Your question suggests the same scenario to me… if I perceive that a member of an "alien group" has done me wrong, I'll be naturally and reasonably skeptical of any members of that group. No one has an inherent right to enter my home, and if I get it wrong in a particular case, the wronged person should suck it up. But this needn't be interpreted as a deep moral judgement against all members of that group. And it shouldn't be.

If a black dude sees a white woman keep her distance on a sketchy street, he should suck it up and not construct a metaphysical issue out of it.

But if a white guy with authority encounters a black woman who doesn't seem to trust him for no immediate reason, he shouldn't construct a metaphysical issue either.