Anonymous ID: 4627ba April 30, 2020, 4:39 a.m. No.8970892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0942 >>1096 >>1427 >>1471

>>8970872

The whole thing was a setup. Flynn's fine. He took rubber bullets for the plan. That's about all you really need to know. And not all the accounts that are avid Q supporters are followed by Flynn, so getting followed by Flynn, though cool, not necessarily and indication of anything, in particular, other than maybe his personal preference of whom to follow.

 

Q's said it many times; you are watching a movie. It's the longest movie ever, but it's a movie.

Anonymous ID: 4627ba April 30, 2020, 5:02 a.m. No.8970994   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1009

>>8970942

Oh, you got me anon. I'm such a shill. Are you not entertained? Are you not enjoying the show? Question:

What are you hoping to find out? Perhaps Flynn's a bad dude? You think he had something to do with the authorship of the State.gov doc? The authors have their names on it, FFS.

Anonymous ID: 4627ba April 30, 2020, 5:17 a.m. No.8971056   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1083

>>8971009

Anon, you seem well-intentioned.

 

Flynn's story arc is part of the setup/trap for the DS operatives that have been contributing to the absolute abortion of law in this country. That's the entire point of it. Flynn's unquestionably a patriot, and perhaps a major proponent to the overall mission of Q.

 

Q's purpose for posting the document, again, was intended to get anons thinking about why it was ever written to begin with. It was presented as a valid "here's what we see, and how to deal with it" for insurgencies in countries in conjunction with the overall scope and objectives of the US Mil strategy, world wide, and what governments might have as plans of action to deal with insurgencies, in partnership with the US Mil. Now, imagine all those wonderful people that put it together were to use the knowledge in it against the American people?

 

There's your plot twist. That's what Q was trying to show everyone.

Anonymous ID: 4627ba April 30, 2020, 5:44 a.m. No.8971230   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1267

>>8971185

>Maybe we should be pushing Defy the lockdown.

Well, that's what Q wants you to see. They are keeping us on lockdown in violation of our constitutional rights. @POTUS is playing optics and saying some are moving too quickly. It's confusing, but whatever. Maybe the point is we should be trusting ourselves instead, huh?

 

Yes, protest by simply, you know, living life. They "govern" over us with our permission to do so, not because they possess special powers or abilities. That authority is granted to them of our own volition. And, to be completely honest, no need to bring God into it.

 

Anons can pray, or they can act. Let's see which one gets the job done sooner.