Anonymous ID: 08fb6d April 30, 2020, 8:35 a.m. No.8972592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2614 >>2658

>>8972534

Here. Read. Learn something.

 

https://www.catholic.com/tract/call-no-man-father

 

In fact, to forbid it would rob the address “Father” of its meaning when applied to God, for there would no longer be any earthly counterpart for the analogy of divine Fatherhood. The concept of God’s role as Father would be meaningless if we obliterated the concept of earthly fatherhood.

 

But in the Bible the concept of fatherhood is not restricted to just our earthly fathers and God. It is used to refer to people other than biological or legal fathers, and is used as a sign of respect to those with whom we have a special relationship.

 

First, as we’ve seen, the imperative “call no man father” does not apply to one’s biological father. It also doesn’t exclude calling one’s ancestors “father,” as is shown in Acts 7:2, where Stephen refers to “our father Abraham,” or in Romans 9:10, where Paul speaks of “our father Isaac.”

 

Second, there are numerous examples in the New Testament of the term “father” being used as a form of address and reference, even for men who are not biologically related to the speaker. There are, in fact, so many uses of “father” in the New Testament, that the objection to Catholics calling priests “father” must be wrong, as we shall see.

 

Third, a careful examination of the context of Matthew 23 shows that Jesus didn’t intend for his words here to be understood literally. The whole passage reads, “But you are not to be called ‘rabbi,’ for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called ‘masters,’ for you have one master, the Christ” (Matt. 23:8–10).

Anonymous ID: 08fb6d April 30, 2020, 8:49 a.m. No.8972766   🗄️.is 🔗kun

And what about the Biblical notion of a Prime Minister, like in Isaiah? When the king is away, does he not have the right to appoint a representative to act in his stead, as stated in the Old Testament?

 

So with our King, Jesus Christ, in Heaven waiting for the time of his second coming, should He not be allowed to appoint a "prime minister" to run his Church and administer to His flock, in accordance with the Old Testament? Did Christ not say He came to fulfill the law, not abolish it? So shouldn't He be intimately more familiar about sacred scripture than someone like you?

 

So does Jesus not have the right to appoint an earthly prime minister (who we call "Pope" or "Bishop of Rome") to run His Church in fulfillment of the law as stated in the Old Testament? Or are you saying you know more about scripture than Jesus?