repostan from heel of last bread for Gerbil

>>8972850 lb

It's your approach that is self-defeating. It is not possible to ram something down everyone's throat every day and night and expect a positive response. Being belligerent to others who are not interested DOES NOT WORK. Psychology 101, fren.

Being belligerent to those who do not want to do the social media operations didn't work either, did it?

You have lurked and formed an opinion on something, which is all well and good. However, your knowledge is limited, as is everyone else's, but people have different parts of the puzzle. No one, not even you, have the entire puzzle. What you have seen and put together is an area of the puzzle, others with information you don't have, have formed a different conclusion as to what it shows. Obsessively posting what you have and being rude and belligerent doesn't help anyone complete the puzzle and you are very disrespectful to anyone who offers to you something you don't have, which may or may not make the picture look a bit different.

I'm not saying you are wrong or they are wrong, but in order to put the puzzle together, many anons are needed, and information from different anons are needed, not just you and what you have put together thus far.

Different anons are online here different times of day, different days of the week, different weeks of the month, time permitting. The responses you have gotten to your opinion on this are from different anons across the world. Try to remember that some have different knowledge base and experience that you do not, and therefore different perspective.

Just like with the social media operations, try to work with anons, instead of declaring, commanding and dictating. There will be some who disagree, and that's okay. There will still be some who don't respond positively, that is bound to happen. But when you work with anons, the result is always better. And the point is positive results, isn't it?

>>8973188

Yes, I've gotten that a few times while archiving threads. I thought maybe Q was posting and the board was being attacked again.

>>8973219

Think about the facts that:

Oriental males are most effected (latches onto something in their lungs)

Blacks are 2nd most effected (hemoglobin issue + obesity, diabetes, asthma)

That should explain to you WHY NO ONE will talk about this. The obvious reason is that there are racial disparities, and as we've been told ad infinitum everyone is exactly the same, there is no race but the human race.

To be clear, this is not a racist statement, it's not about one race vs another, but that is precisely why no one can touch it - it will disprove their main globalist/diversity lie. If an illness affects some population groups (new word for race) more than others, then we aren't all the same are we?

Nothing can be said that will go against their religion of globalism and diversity.

>>8973225

I think it gets overwhelmed sometimes, it will be fine in a few minutes, so check back. I've been using it all morning.

>>8973275

I hope it will help, sincerely.

>>8973329 POTUS RT'd GOP HCJs tweet: Durham is coming

BAKER, NOTABLE

>>8973421

Yes, we learned that, but our hivemind was the reason Q team came to us on 4/pol/ in the first place. We already knew, we were always already under attack because of that [C]haotic environment that is home of the hivemind.

> Distractions are plenty, laughs are ditto, but the job here remains the same.

> the job here remains the same.

Yes it does, thank you for reminding.

>>8973537

>You see me in ramming mode today

It's not just today. It's every day and night on that particular topic.

>so I must always be like this?

You don't ever have to be like that. That's the point. That approach does not work. You have seen it yourself in the different response (overwhelmingly positive) when you changed before.

>so who told them to guard something?

Others will have a different opinion than you, they may have different (more, or less) info than you do. "Ramming mode" will never change someone's mind. That's psychology 101. It doesn't work with anyone and it has the opposite effect. So unless your goal is to get people to become entrenched in their opposing opinion/assessment than yours, your approach is doomed to failure. Not because YOU are a failure, it is the approach that is faulty.

>I self correct when new information proves my current position untenable.

That is the wise position, and it makes life much less stressful.

>they seem to know everything

You are not responsible for them, though. You can present what you have but it is up to them to honestly consider it. If they do not, then you have done your due diligence and can move on.

>New information does not phase them.

Maybe because they have information you do not, that you will not consider?

Maybe they are stubborn and unthinking?

It is hard to say, but if you present what you have and leave it open and let others digest it, you have done your part.

Your part is not to force anyone to agree with your assessment, but to simply share what you have, and be open to what others have.

>I am the only one who is new to saving anything as everyone else is apparently an expert.

We both know that's not true. Some who proclaim themselves 'experts' are not, others are truly experts but may never say that.

>Yeah I have heard this before. Many times.

Because it keeps needing to be said.

>Ah well, I guess it is time to save myself.

Yes.

>Anything else?

I know you are very intelligent, highly motivated, very energized anon who has good ideas and intentions and wants to help make a difference. I know you can be very, very effective with the right approach. I want you to be successful and our MAGA cause to be successful. Anons help each other, sometimes that takes different forms, but the friendship is there and the extension of the hand in friendship is there always.

o7

>>8973811

we have a lot on In-Q-tel

>>8973860

I'm starting to understand (finally)

My archiving responsibilities have just been expanded.

Write, right?

Which way to go? To the [C] or the sea of info?

Sigh