Your point is that the question you asked, evidence, is something you admit is ultimately based on some belief that goes beyond the inner rules/constraints of the meaning of evidence?
Your point is that you asked a question that you have already made up your mind has the answer you just have your belief at root?
Thanks for the projection, rabbi!
Here's a shekel for your "Divide the people by race/religion" dumb fuck narrative.
Again, first DEFINE WHAT YOU EVEN MEAN BY THE TERM "EVIDENCE", that does not itself rely on a belief assumed as true.
You're not thinking detailed enough yet.
Your post just rewords things.
Define exactly how you think something is PROVED as true.
Speak scientifically.
The muhjoo slide shills (inb4 "the term 'muhjoo' is a term 'owned' by JIDF", haha), the muharrest shills, the muh sessions shills, they're all stuck in a static, unevolving, unlearning, pathological rigidity that only reveals their inner NPC coding, which provides us with endless keks
You're a whining little projecting kike aren't you?
Your shit stinks so bad it travels digitally.
Still projecting aren't you moishe?
You suck at shilling and your shit's all retarded you low IQ kikebot