>>8975244 lb

>What was Manafort?

Manafort is more complex and will probably not even have a reporting name available for now. Just completely redacted.

Manafort was legitimately in hot water for being involved with Deripaska for money/asset laundering. The FBI should have briefed Candidate Trump and Kushner on his involvement.

It is also this relation to Deripaska which was used to threaten Ivanka with sanctions. "The best business deal I ever made" is a curious way to describe one's marriage after doing a sudden heel-face on calling off the marriage.

Was President Trump asked to run for office? The answer is that of course he was. It was why Kushner targeted Ivanka.

Paul Manafort is the legitimate intelligence link needed to get Crossfire going in the first place. Those are reporting names under Crossfire

Logical thinking. Remember, they wanted to advance President Trump as a pied piper. Perhaps they even expected to lose the election and then remove him when they felt it was convenient. Why would Hillary and camp have (if our analysis is correct) set up a SCIF to be accessible for the election results? Something about that didn't sit right. And, if that was so, that Hillary was in an SCIF immediately following the election, it stands to reason that the results were quite expected. Or otherwise within projected expectations.

What wasn't expected was that President Trump came prepared to fight and win along with the American people.

That is my understanding of things, at least. I am well aware that President Trump was fast-tracked to win in primary elections around the nation. Republican primaries aren't as corrupt per se, but the winners are chosen in advance.

Q wouldn't point to President Trump's campaign video about a populist revolution after the election for shits and giggles. What is coming is about whether we have freedom or the illusion of freedom. Not what was.

Everything Q says must be taken through a lens of time. As I used to say back before Q was a thing: "It is not about who I am - it is about who I will once have been." Implying that the full gravity of what I was saying could, for most, only be understood in retrospect. IE "news unlocks."