Whether or not there is a virus is irrelevant.
Allow me to ask, though, how it is you know there is a virus?
How did the first battery of tests work? What is reverse transcriptase? Were the kits contaminated?
How did the second battery of tests work? What are antigens and antibodies? How do we know a chosen range of antibodies is specific to a virus?
… What causes the symptoms of an infection?
What are cytokines?
What is their role in symptom expression and immune response?
Whether or not there is a virus… Or perhaps viruses don't work how we think they do at all (what is an exosome?)… And the picture is more complex.
In any event, all that was important is that perception is reality. Perception will be acted upon as though it is reality, and in this way behavior can be sculpted.
And at such a point - even if the truth was that there wasn't a virus (or that it was some other mechanism at play) - then how would the President or even the military have the authority to overturn doctors and media in the minds of the public?
But now all of our home loans are owned by the federal reserve, so I guess it would be no harm if we were to print ourselves out of debt at least in that regard, so bring on the helicopter "money" I suppose… I'm not going to pretend to have a full command over the economic chaos unfolding - particularly the insanity of futures and derivatives to begin with and how that is going to come crashing down. They are things that shouldn't exist - so I don't really mind their end, but to believe it is all without consequence is silly.