>https://pastebin.com/SLMHZNbZ
TY Baker
infiltrate and subvert.
-
Create personality
-
Appear as a "good guy"
-
Provide good intel to garner a following
-
Poison well at appropriate time.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat with new personality.
Ranon
BDanon
PurpleAnon
A
M
T
Retard claiming to be NSA earlier
CTA
Same Playbook
-
Hit and Run.
-
Invoke authority.
-
Establish and rely upon fall-back positions
-
Enigmas have no solution
-
False evidence
-
Manufacture a new truth.
-
Create bigger distractions
-
Vanish
Are their hallmarks
More tactics include
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin – an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.
As demonstrated here >>8980021
>Badges downloaded from google - 20. False evidence
>Flags Out Write Now. Right NOW! - 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority
>##OUR CREED## - 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority
-
Create bigger distractions
-
Create personality
-
Appear as a "good guy"
-
Provide good intel to try to garner a following
-
Poison well at appropriate time.
This one is currently at step 2. Appear as a "good guy"
You'll notice they work in teams as well. Even though all the Anons here know this idiot claiming to be NSA is a LARP, others involved are trying to create a consensus that he is to be trusted. See >>8980130
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
Another Hallmark of these idiots are
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
I've told Mr. WizzWarLarp here to DOXX me with my permission being that he claims to be NSA and working with Q team but he refused "hurr durr you divisionfag" and won't even respond any longer.
Remember Anons,
There is only Q
>Do you do anything else here other than Divisionfag?
>
Yea I make dope as graphics and bake. Do you do anything other than LARP? Fuck no.
Just so we're clear, I'm the same anon thatWRECKEDyou on /pol/ as well.. but I guess you know that cause ya know, NSA and all.
Also, that's from the Army not NSA.
Reverse image is a thing ya know. Figured the NSA would be clued into this.
>This Shift is a Wreck!
>
>HAVE FUN ALL
>
>I will come back when real Anons are on.
>
>Have fun guys. Dinner is calling my name
>
>If you know you know!
>
>Only Justice should be blind.
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
Bye Bye BDAnon.
Since we both know you are still here lurking, I just wanna say thanks. I haven't enjoyed wrecking a shill larper that much in a long time.
I'll make a graphic of these posts so I can expose your ignorance more quickly next time BD.
Also, doesn't matter when you come back. I'mALWAYShere.