Anonymous ID: 582324 April 4, 2018, 5:24 p.m. No.898229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8242 >>8266

>>898087 (last bread)

>>898051 (last bread)

…and Peter was not the Bishop of Rome, it was actually Simon Pater aka Simon Magus, the Samarian from Assyrian who mixed Babylonian mysticism with Christianity and established the Roman Catholic Church

Anonymous ID: 582324 April 4, 2018, 5:27 p.m. No.898266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8302

>>898229

>>898242

study your history, it's not a fairy tale, no Biblical record of the Apostle Peter ever being in Rome.

Makes me wonder about Peter, Paul & Mary

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter,_Paul_and_Mary

Anonymous ID: 582324 April 4, 2018, 5:45 p.m. No.898517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8726 >>8791

>>898312

>>898366

>>898405

>>898441

Nimrod aka Gilgamesh amongst many other names is a strong contender for anti-christ. They found the tomb of Gilgamesh in Iraq in spring of 2003. We invaded shortly thereafter. Three letters

DNA

Peter the Apostle was chosen to minister to the Jews. He would not have been in Rome. Simon Magus the Sorcerer from Samaria on the other hand we know was in Rome. He also went by Simon Pater - Pater being a name for a God/Idol. The entire Roman Catholic Church was predicated upon Simon the Babylonian sorcerer posing as a Christian.