Anonymous ID: bacf3f April 4, 2018, 5:44 p.m. No.898515   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8522 >>8847

>>898156

Dang! I said he'd declare the unfettered immigration a Clear and Present Danger and deploy

them. He's less dramatic than I am, I guess. Just as effective. But doesn't this put the troops

under the control of the governor? Or does POTUS retain C&C?

Anonymous ID: bacf3f April 4, 2018, 5:48 p.m. No.898551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8591

>>898163

Probably reaction to Q posts. If you don't build the bread before 400, you're not getting it done in time,

then impatient anons will throw up any crap with the right number, and the dough is crap

until a real baker rebuilds it after the Q mania subsides. Bakers have done a yeoman's job of

maintaining or rebuilding the breads through the last Q posts sequence. Well done, bakers!

Anonymous ID: bacf3f April 4, 2018, 6:01 p.m. No.898731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8759 >>8833

>>898553

Dangerous. Direct democracy, as the saying goes, is 2 wolves and 1 sheep discussing what is

for dinner. Sometimes a representative needs to vote against what his constituents want for the good

of all. Of course, that truism has been bastardized by the cabal and their pawns to the point

where we might be better off with the pendulum swinging too far toward direct democracy for a

while to bring things back into balance.

 

See the movie 1776 for an example of a Statesman who votes correctly against his

constituents' will. Q likes movies.

Anonymous ID: bacf3f April 4, 2018, 6:08 p.m. No.898861   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>898759

And even more pitfalls that will fuck the whole nation if exploited. I think we can agree that there

are people who will take advantage of loopholes for their own purposes. That's really why we're

here now, isn't it? I like our present framework of checks and balances. The problem is that it

requires honorable people in power, which is where we have lost our way.