>>8982927 (pb)

Gretchen Whitmer pops up in one of John Podestas emails talking about some AV summit. Not sure what that is. Here are some interesting snippets of that email.

From:ntanden@gmail.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Date: 2015-02-24 02:47

Subject: Fwd: AV Summit: Key Points from Day 1

Hi all,

Here's a quick rundown of key points from Day 1 of the AV Summit for

potential discussion tomorrow afternoon. These are highly anecdotal, Mary

or Jennifer pls feel free to add. Thanks all and see you tomorrow - GS

-There were repeated references by AV staff and many panelists about the

need to move beyond cycle-by-cycle targeting and to consider long-term

strategies to win back power in states with incremental gains to 2020 and

beyond.

-Redistricting: a three-prong strategy is needed: 1) traditional electoral

targeting; 2) opportunities to change the game thru registration and

engagement of RAE/NAM voters and ridding coattails of strong candidates on

top of ticket; 3) reform of the process via ballot or legislative

initiatives.

-Redistricting again: an initial analysis of unregistered, non-white

populations indicates that they reside disproportionately in swing state

legislative districts (not in Blue or Red leg seats - the very high

concentration of these voters in swing regions was far beyond expectations

and represents a big opportunity).

Here is the part of the email that references Gretchen

Tomorrow's sessions (partial list):

-We'll start the day with remarks from former MI Senate Minority Leader

Gretchen Whitmer about all that is at stake in the states from her

perspectives on fights against right to work (for far less), and assaults

on women's health care and reproductive freedom during her tenure.

• https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/42635>>8982966

Here is my takeaway from Qs more recent posts. We have a document with information regarding insurgency. Combining that with what we've learned over the last 3 years or so, it seems to me that there are various actors out there each with their own particular motives who, when it comes to bringing us down as a country, are in agreement with eachother. So, it seems to me to view it like a crime to solve. Who has motive and what is it, who has opportunity and what kind of opportunity, and what method is/was being used to accomplish the crime?

China - Like most countries, probably wants to dominate the world. Two potential factions who may or may not be working together are, their own criminal elements and the state. Motives are almost certainly money and/or power in either or both cases. Opportunity at least in the case of the state, since they thought they removed all of our assets in their country they must have figured they had the advantage at least for the moment. As far as methods go, they also had billions of dollars to throw at whatever avenues seemed to them to allow them to further their control and power within our country and other countries as well. Overall goal? Gain a much control over this country as they could via our own stupid, greedy and corrupt politicians.

Iran- Iran is probably trying to essentially do the same thing as China. It seems they had their own agents like Jarrett and Obummer etc. I suspect that Jarrett had more power than Killary because she seemed to be able to tell Killary no if she wanted to. Killary had to do what she was told. I make that statement because from some of the things I've read, Jarrett pushed Obummer for Dem candidate and Hillbags couldn't do a damn thing about it.

There is probably more than just one faction working on us but they may be working together in some things when they have corresponding goals. From what I am seeing of our own so called leaders, they don't give a rats ass about us as long as they can make bank and run around being asshats at our expense. That is one of the reasons I don't like the idea of globalism. They have no sense of loyalty except to themselves. That makes for dangerous leaders.

>>8983555

Yeah, that seems to be fairly true. The international bankers. It always comes down to money. I think that is why they took out Muammar Gaddafi, from what I remember he was going to go back to gold currency and they didn't like that idea.

Call to color.

Hand salute.