Team Trump to Jim Acosta: Here’s Your Examples of Mail-In Voter Fraud

President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign on Wednesday responded to CNN reporter Jim Acosta, who demanded evidence of the president’s claims of voter fraud.

“You’ve been talking about voter fraud since the beginning of this administration and where is the evidence of it?” Acosta asked during the White House press briefing, insisting that “all the experts say voter fraud is rare.”

Trump replied, “I think there’s a lot of evidence, but we’ll provide you with some, okay?”

The president’s re-election campaign responded quickly to Acosta’s request, noting there were nine people charged in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas with “vote harvesting” and mail ballots, a political operative in New York stealing and submitting absentee ballots, and a resident in Pennsylvania receiving seven separate ballots in the mail.

The campaign also shared a Heritage Foundation document of over 1,000 proven cases of vote fraud.

“Democrats and the mainstream media always scoff at claims of voter fraud, but then completely ignore evidence from across the country,” Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said in a statement. “The obvious reason is that Democrats are just fine with the possibility of voter fraud. And many in the media just see the world their way.”

The Trump campaign also quoted an election expert in the New York Times who said although election fraud was rare, “the most common type of such fraud in the United States involves absentee ballots” through the mail.

President Trump cited ongoing legal action from Judicial Watch forcing states to clear millions of ineligible voter registrations within 90 days as proof of voter fraud.

The White House also shared details of 2005 commission led by President Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush’s secretary of state James A. Baker III that concluded mail-in ballots “remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”

“Outside those in the establishment media who are more interested in attacking the President than the facts, there’s a clear consensus that universal mail-in voting would be vulnerable to fraud,” a White House source told Breitbart News in a statement.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/09/team-trump-to-jim-acosta-heres-your-examples-of-mail-in-voter-fraud/

voter id/Fraud - mega.nz/#F!EV4HkQ7A!fxp-5L2RjgKl1D3YK1xGYA

Two-thirds of Americans say voting by mail would increase voter fraud, poll finds

Findings include 48% of Democrats who say nixing in-person voting for the mailbox would trigger fraud.

Nearly two-thirds of American voters say the country moving entirely to mail-in voting would likely increase voter fraud, according to the latest Just the News Daily Poll with Scott Rasmussen.

Sixty-two percent (62%) of voters believe that having everyone vote by mail is likely to increase voter fraud, while just 29% disagree. The totals include 39% who believe an increase in fraud is Very Likely and just 15% who say it is Not at All Likely.

Rasmussen noted what he called "a massive partisan divide" - 81% of Republicans believe voting by mail would lead to more fraud. Democrats are evenly divided (48% say it's likely, 45% disagree). Among Independent voters, 59% believe it would probably lead to an increase in voter fraud while 27% disagree.

"These findings are certainly influenced by each party's narrative of voter fraud," Rasmussen said. "Republicans tend to believe that many people vote who are not eligible to vote. Voting by mail makes it impossible to check voter ids and take other steps to ensure that the ballots were actually cast by an eligible voters.

"Democrats on the other hand tend to believe that the bigger problem is that eligible voters are denied their right to cast a ballot through voter suppression tactics. They see voting by mail as encouraging voter participation and are suspicious of anyone who opposes that goal."

Just the News has reported on how Democrats appear united in their push to use "social distancing" around coronavirus to move the country toward November mail-in voting, expanded voting dates or possibly even "drive-thru voting."

Republicans suspect Democrats could be exploiting a health crisis for partisan gain. Some fear a rapid move to alter the General Election system could result in the type of chaos seen at the Iowa Democratic Caucus in February.

"Still, despite concerns about voter fraud, Americans are open to the idea if better alternatives are not presented," Rasmussen said. "Some public polls have shown an overwhelming preference for mail voting as opposed to the traditional approach of standing in long lines at crowded facilities. However, our poll last week showed that just as many are supportive of states establishing new in-person voting procedures that include appropriate social distancing protocols."

Respondents were asked: "Suppose that for November's presidential election, in-person voting was eliminated, and everyone would vote by mail. How likely is it that voting by mail would lead to an increase in voter fraud?" They replied as below:

39% Very likely

23% Somewhat likely

14% Not very likely

15% Not at all likely

9% Not sure

The national survey of 1,200 registered voters was conducted April 23-25, 2020 by Rasmussen, a polling veteran. Margin of sampling error: +/- 2.8% for full sample.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/poll-finds-23-american-voters-say-voting-mail-would-increase-voter-fraud#article

>>8976284

VA governor in bed with Warner/Kaine and is in full court press to promote voting fraud this November (eliminated voter id, pressing mail-in-ballots with no witness, 11K dead voters on rolls). Help needed in Old Dominion.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/04/stealing_the_election_in_plain_sight.html

A prominent Democratic lawyer who represented Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign [Marc Elias] is threatening to sue the state of Nevada unless it immediately suspends prosecutions for ballot harvesting before the June 9 primary, among a slew of other demands, according to a letter obtained by Fox News on Tuesday.

This well known Democrat fixer has a long history of fighting voter id laws in state after state, with his legal challenges bankrolled by none other than George Soros. He is the point of the spear in the left's effort to wrest control of the electoral process from the people of the United States. Having licked his wounds after the 2016 debacle, Elias has emerged again, fighting the same battles, singing the same tunes.

Kentucky's GOP Legislature Overrides Liberal Governor Bashear's Veto On voter id Requirements

The Kentucky state legislature passed a bill requiring ID to vote. Democrat governor Andy Beshear, who has only been on the job for a few months, vetoed the bill.

Well it turns out Kentucky has a relatively low threshold for overriding a governor's veto, which only requires a simply majority.

The Kentucky General Assembly is overwhelmingly Republican, outnumbering the democrats 29-9 in the Senate and 61-37 in the House.

So the legislature got back together last week and took up votes to override Beshear's veto, which passed by yuge margins in both chambers.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/kentucky-legislature-overrides-governor-bashears-veto-voter-requirements/

Judicial watch gets proof.

Remember Mr. Scandal Free?

(yes these are dated but there must be a reason Fitton is sending notification on them)

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/obama-justice-department-shut-down-federal-acorn-investigation-according-documents-obt/?utm

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) detailing federal investigations into the alleged corrupt activities of Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The documents reference serious allegations of corruption and voter registration fraud by ACORN as well as the Obama administration's decision to shut down a criminal investigation without filing criminal charges.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-and-allied-education-foundation-file-supreme-court-brief-in-support-of-north-carolina-election-integrity-law/?utm

Nope not trying to steal elections at all, no siree…

The Obama Justice Department (DOJ), working with allied advocacy groups, is challenging North Carolina's election integrity reforms that require voter id, reduce early voting days, eliminate same-day voter registration, and require voters to vote where they are registered. The Obama Justice Department and allied advocacy groups have targeted voter id and other election integrity laws, alleging, with no evidence, that the popular laws disparately and adversely affects minority voting rights.

Under the racial "disparate impact" theory, which is at the heart of the controversial Fourth Circuit opinion, a defendant can be held liable for discrimination for a policy that statistically disadvantages a minority group, even if that negative impact was neither foreseen nor intended. The more broadly accepted view by courts under Section 2 of the VRA says that a violation occurs only when voting practices are motivated by a discriminatory intent and that any incidental racially disparate impact of a voting law is not sufficient on its own to prove a violation of Section 2.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-statement-regarding-eric-holders-retirement/

TLDR: Holder lies, lied to congress, lied lied lied

WHERE IS THE ACCOUNTABILITY? OH WAIT, HE'S A DEMOCRAT…I FORGOT!

>>8822984

By November, DoJ and Treasury could have a database of nearly all suspect voter identities that could be instantly cross referenced with all elections. If the fraud results tilt Dem, then Dem R fukked.