>>8991968 (pb-notes)
>Judge Orders Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Investigators to Pay $1.5 Million to Abortion Giant
>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/01/judge-orders-planned-parenthood-baby-parts-investigators-to-pay-1-5-million-to-abortion-giant/
Judge William Orrick III
"served as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice during the Obama administration"
"He served as head of DOJ's Office of Immigration Litigation.[9] For a 10-month period during the lengthy nomination/confirmation process, Orrick returned to Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass.[3]"
"In 2015, Orrick issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), an anti-abortion group, from releasing secretly recorded videos of the National Abortion Federation (NAF). CMP had earlier released heavily edited videos, which purported to show that Planned Parenthood had been inappropriately selling fetal tissue, Orrick issued a restraining order. In his decision Orrick wrote that a TRO was necessary to prevent irreparable harm to NAF "in the form of harassment, intimidation, violence, invasion of privacy, and injury to reputation, and the requested relief is in the public interest."[23] In subsequent proceedings, Orrick reviewed hundreds of hours of videos and found no evidence of wrongdoing on NAF's behalf, and concluded that the CMP, led by anti-abortion activist David Daleiden, had "misleadingly edited videos to make it appear as though abortion providers were breaking the law."[24] In 2016, Orrick subsequently issued a preliminary injunction against CMP blocking the release of their videos; after Daleiden violated the injunction, Orrick found Daleiden and his two attorneys in civil contempt and fined them $200,000.[24] The contempt finding was upheld on appeal.[24]"
"In April 2017, Orrick stayed the implementation of the Trump administration's Executive Order 13768 to withhold funding from sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement authorities, saying Trump had no authority to attach new conditions to federal spending.[25][26] In November 2017, Orrick ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara (who challenged the order), finding that Section 9(a) of the Executive Order was unconstitutional on its face as a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and the counties' Tenth and Fifth Amendment rights and issuing a nationwide permanent injunction against its implementation.[27][28] In 2018, Orrick's ruling was upheld on appeal, but the scope of the injunction was narrowed to San Francisco and Santa Clara.[29]"
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Orrick_III
This fuckwadd needs a DEEP dig!