Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 4:19 p.m. No.8993181   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3213 >>3425

>>8993169

really?

Physicists take all these variables be it dual, trinary, or vector variables and put them in an array for each field they are working with called a unitary group to basically define a particle (be it a real particle or a force particle).

Force particles are just the interaction of the field with another field (particle) that acts on the receiving field and changes the characteristics of that field (particle) – essentially multidimensional wave interaction/interference. Think of every variable as a multidimensional field vector in a field interacting with the 4D field of say a quark, or a proton or a neutron, or an electron/photon. Every variable defined in these particles that you have never heard of is the interaction of a multidimensional field (I like to think of it as Fractal Fields, as I can visualize the twists and turns of the fractal crossing our 4D reality).

Any Mass creates a warp in 4D. Higgs Field necessary to create any 4D world as a 4D world requires time and a physical reality. Physicists are actually moving beyond that now, but do not understand it well as they are dealing with fields and vectors they cannot really measure until it causes a change in 4D. This probably why they chose to deal in particle mentality rather than field mentality; because if you just have to measure the variables after the interaction all you can do is figure the vectors that defined that interaction (particle). But it is very hard to understand a reality if you do not accept the outside forces acting on that reality, have no way to measure them, and do not have the will to think outside the box and define a geometric field seen and just think of one vector of that field.

Summing up for now:

There are fields within 4D pe can see be it magnetic or electric and many others. There are also fields that interact with other fields within 4D to change 4D, some defined some are not. But understand there is more than we know.

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 4:30 p.m. No.8993270   🗄️.is 🔗kun

quote showing how mass objects create a non mass object by wave interference.

 

In particle and condensed matter physics, Goldstone bosons or Nambu–Goldstone bosons (NGBs) are bosons that appear necessarily in models exhibiting spontaneous breakdown of continuous symmetries. They were discovered by Yoichiro Nambu in the context of the BCS superconductivity mechanism,[1] and subsequently elucidated by Jeffrey Goldstone,[2] and systematically generalized in the context of quantum field theory.[3]

 

These spinless bosons correspond to the spontaneously broken internal symmetry generators, and are characterized by the quantum numbers of these. They transform nonlinearly (shift) under the action of these generators, and can thus be excited out of the asymmetric vacuum by these generators. Thus, they can be thought of as the excitations of the field in the broken symmetry directions in group space—and are massless if the spontaneously broken symmetry is not also broken explicitly.

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 4:32 p.m. No.8993286   🗄️.is 🔗kun

If, instead, the symmetry is not exact, i.e. if it is explicitly broken as well as spontaneously broken, then the Nambu–Goldstone bosons are not massless, though they typically remain relatively light; they are then called pseudo-Goldstone bosons or pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone bosons (abbreviated PNGBs).

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 4:36 p.m. No.8993320   🗄️.is 🔗kun

What the FUCK is a Phonon?

 

In fluids, the phonon is longitudinal and it is the Goldstone boson of the spontaneously broken Galilean symmetry. In solids, the situation is more complicated; the Goldstone bosons are the longitudinal and transverse phonons and they happen to be the Goldstone bosons of spontaneously broken Galilean, translational, and rotational symmetry with no simple one-to-one correspondence between the Goldstone modes and the broken symmetries.

In magnets, the original rotational symmetry (present in the absence of an external magnetic field) is spontaneously broken such that the magnetization points into a specific direction. The Goldstone bosons then are the magnons, i.e., spin waves in which the local magnetization direction oscillates.

The pions are the pseudo-Goldstone bosons that result from the spontaneous breakdown of the chiral-flavor symmetries of QCD effected by quark condensation due to the strong interaction. These symmetries are further explicitly broken by the masses of the quarks, so that the pions are not massless, but their mass is significantly smaller than typical hadron masses.

The longitudinal polarization components of the W and Z bosons correspond to the Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken part of the electroweak symmetry SU(2)⊗U(1), which, however, are not observable.[nb 1] Because this symmetry is gauged, the three would-be Goldstone bosons are absorbed by the three gauge bosons corresponding to the three broken generators; this gives these three gauge bosons a mass, and the associated necessary third polarization degree of freedom. This is described in the Standard Model through the Higgs mechanism. An analogous phenomenon occurs in superconductivity, which served as the original source of inspiration for Nambu, namely, the photon develops a dynamical mass (expressed as magnetic flux exclusion from a superconductor), cf. the Ginzburg–Landau theory.

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 4:43 p.m. No.8993418   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3533

Ohh I get it a Phonon is the magnetic field usage of electrons as a free field that binds atoms together - it is a group of free electrons in a solid that bind the positive atoms together and allow magnetic fields within those solids.

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 5:01 p.m. No.8993628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3722

>>8993425

it is a long complicated list of sauce but I can do it.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=unification+of+weak+and+electromagnetic+interactions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldstone_boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_transformation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_symmetry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_number

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_mode

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_amplitude

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_scattering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubble_chamber

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang%E2%80%93Mills_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_group

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group#The_group_SU(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weinberg_angle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_isospin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_and_eigenvectors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_(physics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_hypercharge

There ya go you can figure it out yourself if you don't believe me.

Kek

Anonymous ID: 796c72 May 1, 2020, 5:03 p.m. No.8993646   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8993425

>>>8993425

>it is a long complicated list of sauce but I can do it.

>https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=unification+of+weak+and+electromagnetic+interactions

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldstone_boson

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_transformation

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_symmetry

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS_theory

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_number

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_mode

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_amplitude

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_scattering

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubble_chamber

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang%E2%80%93Mills_theory

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_group

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group#The_group_SU(2)

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weinberg_angle

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_isospin

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_and_eigenvectors

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_(physics)

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_hypercharge

>There ya go you can figure it out yourself if you don't believe me.

>Kek