>>8993748 pb
>consolidation info in the dough
it's not complicated. it's like putting a folder within a folder, that's all. keeps all the info but you have to work a little hard to get at it. a motivated person will do that work.
>i might be growing tits
>"at what point must we demand Tits or GTFO?"
when the tits are grown
Optional baking with two-page notables has been done for some time now.
Why? Bc breads are somewhat slower even in the day and news cycle faster (more notables per bread, on the average). Two-page notes gets around the problems this can cause.
Also makes baking less stressful, not having to worry about "body too long" when baking -much easier to split the page than to consolidate in the middle of a bake.
Some bakers stick to one-page notables, which is fine, too. I do it when i can.
Ok, here's an idea:
From what i can gather, Covid-19 works rather like an auto immune disease in some ways, turning the body's defenses against the body.
Children don't have much in the way of defenses as compared to adults.
So are relatively safe from Covid-19.
Anyone more anons with cell biology or immunology backgrounds care to weigh in on this idea??
Anon, you gotta have a newspeg for long or involved diggs. From Q, POTUS or some other mover&shaker. I have many pretty good digs that have gotten no traction–until there's some current event to relate them to. Don't give up, if your current digs don't get picked up, do ones that will.
VA study can be faulted on some many scientific grounds. I guess the connection with Gilead gives us the "why."
Interesting. So it sounds like Fauci et al like the model of targeting the very ill rather than trying to prevent mildly ill patients from becoming very ill. Typical allopathic thinking.
>country threads
can you understand that your interest in accessing all the countries with great ease may not be a priority for all anons? if it were, they were be clamoring for the changes you seek.
You obviously have a list of links you can use for your own purposes, why not just do so? That is what i do when i have special links i want to access.
Assuming that everyone here either has the same priorities as you or SHOULD have the same priorities - well, that's not gonna fly. We all have things about which we feel strongly - biblefags want everyone prayin', diggers want everyone diggin' (and diggin' on the stuff that "really matters" - them THEM), meme warriors want everyone doing twitter meme warfare, and bakers want moar bakers.
It's all important. But none is most important.
o7
>yw, will put him in a place of honor, kek.
don't agree that board is more shallow, anons don't read digs, etc. if anything, the opposite is true. was gonna cite a recent example of something i did but that's not the point. sounds like what you really want is for Q to endorse important meme ops, so they get more traction. Everyone wants that attn for the stuff they think is important. No relfection on either Q or the board tho if that does not happen. It is what it is.
>you might have an upset anon when the one who made today's bake comes back, but that's what worked for me in there, thank you
NO, NO, NO.
Not ok to ask one baker to make a dough change while another baker "who might not like it" is away from the board.
unethical & divisive
Big red flag.
We don't let shills push us around, should not let single anons do it either.
Really don't like the way this thing is being pushed, pushed, pushed by anon - and now sneakily. Not the way we do things around here - ever. The very impetus is dead wrong.
At this point, don't effing care about the space issue. My patience - which is considerable - is wearing thin. For weeks, this thing has been bandied about. So much time on this, and just in response to ONE anon, as far as i can tell.
Just. say. no.
got sauce on death rates before and after 5g in WA state?