>>8993735

>>8993804

but it's not about work, it's about using the board. i'm glad they do that with old notables for archiving but i don't read those, i don't bakebin, i read the notables that are right here, in the dough, and that link to posts. and i like it when i can do the same with the countries, doesn't seem so much to ask when the maps anon can have what it wants.

now ok, that's just me, but may i kindly request bakers to deposit a request, or take a vote? i don't know how you do these things, finding out along the way

>>8993969

can we have

>>8993735

Other Dedicated Research Threads

https://pastebin.com/Zynq7Hu3

International Q Research Threads

these but like the notables? i don't mind the pastebin for the bakers, i don't want to get in their way, but if we could see the threads too as anons i would be happy.

you might have an upset anon when the one who made today's bake comes back, but that's what worked for me in there, thank youi

>>8994042

> lost major ops and resources in the dough.

ok so you too?

this cure is worse than the disease

>>8994104

> is retarded.

iron eagle eager lion sure seemed retarded before Q posted about it

>>8994149

>It'll have to be discussed with everyone, so thanks for your patience with it.

sure, but as the room anon said, and i saw with my own eyes earlier, seems those room issues were fixed already. you guys just walked back the work anons previously did to fix it, that don't make no sense

>>8994228

>Assuming that everyone here either has the same priorities as you or SHOULD have the same priorities - well, that's not gonna fly. We all have things about which we feel strongly - biblefags want everyone prayin', diggers want everyone diggin' (and diggin' on the stuff that "really matters" - them THEM), meme warriors want everyone doing twitter meme warfare, and bakers want moar bakers.

>It's all important. But none is most important.

hey i'm being nice here, i don't need this attitude, that's quite the example you're setting for working together.

i'm trying to explain to you that having the links to the threads - yes the country threds, but also the biblefags, and the diggers, EVERYONE.

you're just being stubborn with your baker technology that's no good for us. Other anons don't clamor, well not much i can do about that. And you're not letting them much time to enjoy having the links there, since you took control and put things how YOU wanted them while saying the bakers before you were shills.

now you might accuse me of being lazy but i figured out a lot of things to be here too, and i thought WWG1WGA.

>It's all important. But none is most important.

exactly. now practice what you preach, please.

>>8994322

> and someone removed it

i don't like this. they sure were quick to call everyone else who disagrees a shill

>>8994402

"fuck you", wtf, baker?

>>8994228

>Assuming that everyone here either has the same priorities as you or SHOULD have the same priorities - well, that's not gonna fly.

>>8994411

>anon did ya follow any of the convo at all kek

the deep bake stuff is too much for me, that's not my purview, but hell, i can see what's on the board.

and these guys came in unhappy with how it was and blamed it on shills and now they're telling anons to fuck off. you tell me where the shill is, then, if i'm just a dumb anon who's not cool enough to bake >>8994411

>>8994459

>You can't poke someone in the eye then demand your way to atone for it

There's also a wise parable about specks and planks in eyes, fren

>>8994486

sure, show us what you got!

>>8994496

> to push your endchan ops, not the other way around as it should

everybody pulls the cover, yes, we know.

you bakers have your corner, why can't those guys? please be consistent