Because of the processes involved, de jure standards can be slow to produce. Development and approval cycles can take time as each documented step is followed through the process. Achieving consensus, while important and good, can be a lengthy activity. This is especially apparent when not all members of the committee want the standard to succeed. For various reasons—often competitive business—participants in a committee are there to stall or halt the standard. However, once a de jure standard completes the entire process, the implementers and consumers of the standard gain a high level of confidence that it will serve their needs well

https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/embedded-revolution/article/21796209/whats-the-difference-between-de-jure-and-de-facto-standards

Big companies stopping progress my 2cents regarding de facto bullshit