>>9004258 (pb)

Yeah, I got (you)'d once and I, too, was like "WTF"?

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 27704f No.5523860 📁

Mar 5 2019 16:38:17 (EST)

Anonymous ID: c45779 No.5523830 📁

Mar 5 2019 16:37:07 (EST)

>>5523765

Pointed this out earlier today. They specifically called them "bombs", not "suspicious packages", as per the norm.

>>5523830

"Fire."

Q

My head went to lots of places with that one. Then I remembered another Q drop:

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 03c2f4 No.127154 📁

Dec 19 2017 18:00:02 (EST)

We won't telegraph our moves to the ENEMY.

We will however light a FIRE to flush them out.

Q

I still wonder if that was the message being conveyed.

https://qanon.pub/#4076

Q,

I'm OK with you guys having your reasons/methods as long as you're OK with anons being in disagreement on some of those reasons/methods. I'm still firmly in the camp that "cutting to the chase" has it's own merit in winning hearts and minds. And yes, I'm still in the "tell is better than show" camp – at least sometimes, and especially when it comes to people being used to make examples of psychological warfare.

You guys have made it blatantly obvious that it's not learning unless it's experienced. When it comes to some lessons, I'm certain there are anons (people) that are good with book learning from time to time.

Still eternally thankful for what you guys are doing.

Still going to have some disagreements with things.

Doesn't mean we aren't going to have disagreements.

<3

>>9005801

Chinese fire drills to execute common core philosophy lead to people dying and an abortion of justice.