>>9007549 (LB)
You are incorrect.
It isn't that simple.
Here's a way to look at it…
Before the nuclear bomb was developed in the Manhattan Project and used/tested on Japan, no one thought a bomb could obliterate an entire city. No one could comprehend that type of lethality.
People thought carpet bombing was bad.
The equivalent to what we are discussing involving AI would be you thinking that it is merely databases [carpet bombs].
When in actuality, it is "Science Fiction AI" [nuclear bombs that can glass an entire city].
Do you understand what I am trying to say?
AI is magnitudes more lethal than a nuclear bomb.