Anonymous ID: 037c47 May 3, 2020, 7:52 a.m. No.9010541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0559 >>0591 >>0664

>>9010503

I get that the situation is the same, but can you find anything stating that they are using the same modeling for covid? you are citing their method for the flu 2 years ago, which may be the current method, but what you liked provides nothing to support that it is their current method for covid.

Anonymous ID: 037c47 May 3, 2020, 8:03 a.m. No.9010609   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9010559

what you originally posted says absolutely nothing about covid. suggesting it is the same database is mere assumption on your part since nothing in what you posted asserts that fact. if you have something that actually shows what you are suggesting then by all means post it. until then your sauce is moldy.

Anonymous ID: 037c47 May 3, 2020, 8:22 a.m. No.9010728   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9010664

what you posted here >>9010407

shows the method of how the data was collected for the flu during the 2017-2018 season not current fucking numbers for covid or current method for tracking. keep playing stupid.