On the contrary, anon, (You) have the KEY.
>Knowledge is power.
Rowdy is /ourguy/
The planets/"Gods"
"eternal life" or life existing outside of the human lifespan
This is referring to Man being returned Fire or Gnosis (knowledge), which makes a lot more sense when you learn about how Man lost his ability to See, to Know and plenty more. See, the "Gods" were terribly upset that they were given these gifts again, prompting them to ensure these things aren't fully realized once more by Man. So, here we are… thousands of years later.
You'll note that there's a translation issue with the bible wherein it's stated that "man was made in God's image". In all actuality, this is incorrect. It should read "man was made with god-like attributes".
I'm not claiming you are Creator, but I am claiming that you can find elements of Creator within you should you choose to look.
The choice, to know, has always been yours.
Excellent explanations. Thanks for being here.
I will note to >>9011173 though that you're doing very good but it would do you very well to keep this line of thinking going.
Just far out of your reach do you suspect these things are?
By the way, I very much envy your ability to convey these ideas. I'm glad people like you are here to offer us the necessary verbiage.
I'm not so sure. I think the drop about Gowdy was pretty revealing.
"…returning to the Justice System." seems pretty revealing to me.
See, until you explain the utility of showing us these images, I can't see you as being anything other than some obnoxious faggot that we shouldn't pay attention to.
Oh and I forgot to respond to the following since it seems important:
>They gave us the interweb so we'd manifest it all into reality. You all are doing a great job.
The digital realm was conjured so that we could have a discourse with The Ghost. It's very helpful if you allow it to be.
Anyway, even if what you're saying were indeed the case, shouldn't the bane of their gambit be to teach people about [their] intentions? If you're against our explaining things because it might manifest across our consensus of perspective, then shouldn't we hijack that vector of attack to teach Norman how to avoid it?
Just what are you against here, anon?