A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. Marsbury v. Madison 1803

>>9012530

Thanq Anon it was notables a few days back the first time anon posted .

Just for fresh eyes since Q brought it up.

>>9012530

Here ya go allPBlinks

#11463 04/28/20 (Tue) 20:21:46

>>8955647 anon submits Marbury vs Madison-A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void

>>8955715 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law-justice.gov another reminder

>>8955808, >>8955875 Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void-voidjudgements.net

>>9012551

ThanQ just forwarded to Oregon GOP

>>9012646

Another good one

>>8956365 (pb) moar from lawfag: Meaning and Examples of the Color of Law They Didn’t Tell You

>>9012870

Domestic Enemies

>>9012942

o7

Good work Twatterfags!

>>9012990

>https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1256999526944124928

CAP

>>9013049

>priestap

For just a moment anon thought it was Chinese for "Please Stop" kek

Edward William Priestap