I'm just gonna quietly remind everyone that Q cannot incite to riot. The language of the past few posts is as strong as Q is able to tell us it's time to fight. Now, I'll go back to my last peaceful afternoon…

>>9014697

I didn't say violence. I said fight. Allow me to be clear: If Q tells us to "fight" and someone uses VIOLENCE, then people will blame Q. Q cannot be mistaken for inciting to riot. Do you know people can fight without violence?

Don't go out and shoot people. Don't go out an lynch people. FIGHT. Stand up. Be counted in massive numbers in public. Open your business. Do what you must to take your rights back. FIGHT.

>>9014692

Sorry, I should've been more clear. Fight peacefully. Stand up, be counted. I simply meant Q can't be mistaken for inciting to riot, so stronger language is not possible.

>>9014819

That would be awesome.

>>9014861

We're awake. Their GREATEST fear is the death that is coming for them.

>>9014872

Thank you, anon. Certain anons are too low i.q. to understand that we have a duty to fight. Hopefully without violence. But, where necessary, with lethal force.

>>9014872

see

>>9014928

It certainly CAN. And no, it's NOT my definition. Don't put words in my post, especially without reading the responses. I'll admit to being a bit clumsy in my wording, however. Thanks for the admonition.

>>9014874

Q is literally telling you to stand up. Do you even read your own posts, faggot?

>>9015063

>accused of terrorism

Not all anons are anons.

>>9015196

Kek

Q, check your spelling on that one. Intentional?

>>9015211

^^^^There it is.

Eyes on.

>>9015196

>>9015206

>>9015225

>>9015239

>>9014861

>>9015289

WRWY, Sir! YES! o7