>>9016246 Possibly, can't be certain about JA at all, because there undoubtedly is information that we anons don't have yet. He could hurt our enemies quite badly, and may have already done so. Heck, maybe he sat in the GJ room with Kim, raining on the perps. On the other hand, maybe he is guilty of everything he is accused of. But consider that the very purpose of a trial is to establish guilt/innocence, and that if JA goes before 12, he may be found innocent. Consider that our leaders may want that. Also consider the Q reference to the JA tweet with the chess position, all of which seemed fairly collegial, yes?

>>9016712 "And even if he did slide the digit, he was thinking of ME. I just know it."

>>9016860 … "could" hurt our enemies. In situations like this, sometimes we have to go with the gut. If he is guilty, then he is guilty, but I find the gut rooting for it to be different. Unlike Snowden.