dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 9c22a9 May 5, 2020, 1:03 p.m. No.9041965 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2796

Hi there. I am the one who has been asking for the research done on the hashtags and general engagement for the hours of 5-8 PM (EST) for which this Op would be run. This is very important to do in the planning stage.

Test and check the engagement during this time of day for each of the last 14 days so the trends are visible (more engagement on Tues 7pm, more engagement Thursday 5-6 pm) etc.

Test and check the existing hashtags for the same last 14 days, the same way.

Post the results of both here. The charts are the easiest to see & understand quickly for anyone visiting the thread.

Again, this is testing the already used hashtags you will be incorporating in this Op.

The reason for doing this in the planning stage is that you have to have historic data/trends, and you have to have a baseline against which to measure the success/failure of the Op.

→ If you have no baseline you can't determine success rate because there's nothing to compare it to.

This was how we broke twitter with the #ReleaseTheMemo campaign. Pre-testing/data gathering during planning, constant checking on engagement and reach and then being able to adjust as we went along.

>>9041322

>VoterID

That relies on Congress to pass a law requiring that, which is not likely to happen any time soon. Q's recent posts on Flynn the coup-plotters and the hoax virus show the multiple areas of focus atm because those are the topics the mockingbirds are not and will not cover, so it's anons' job to get it out to them.

>>9042041

Anons are here at Q's direction, which is at POTUS' direction. Anons are here to follow Q's directions, not what one anon wants as a focus. Q's posts provide the direction to anons, so the areas of focus have been shown and voter ID was not one of them, at this time.

Anonymous ID: 9c22a9 May 5, 2020, 2:06 p.m. No.9042859 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2927

>>9042796

>What trends and hashtags would you suggest researching?

Spelled out very clearly in the post you responded to:

>Test and check the existing hashtags for the same last 14 days, the same way.

So engagement overall during those times, and hashtag usage (EXISTING hashtags we use) also during those times for the same 14 day period, in order to establish the baseline.

>if /qresearch/ can't coordinate with twitterfags to do an op

We can and we do.

We are the twitterfags, we connect with other "big" twitterfags and we DO IT.

But planning an Op requires thinking it through - having a goal in mind, and mapping out how to get there (including what material used) - for that we look to Q. We do the background (get baseline, gather the materials) and do it.

No skipping steps = more successful Op.

You said you worked with original WRanon lady? Do you remember how she developed and planned Ops?

>>9042927

>I want to develop, plan, and organize it here

So go ahead and do the research and post it here. That would be one of the first things to do to see if it is something that has even the possibility of working.

For example OG WRanon would do that, she would also check the engagement for different times of day, days of the week, like Weds at 10:30-12noon was really hot, whereas Weds 5-7 was not, but took off at 7:30.

Don't you remember her doing that?

Anyway, that needs to be done at the beginning, so that a proposal can be made with a background, not just a good-sounding idea.

>I'm posting it a few times a day when I can.

Careful with that, post it too much and you'll kick a fire ants' nest. A few times is okay, but really, it's important to have done that research before proposing.

To be really clear - I think this is a good idea, but Ops go much better when vital steps are not skipped. So we need the data as background before anything else.