>>9024702 lb
>>9024689 lb
Antarctica
Antarctica.
Go back. Nothing here.
Off limits.
Completely encompassed by military blockade.
Trust us, it's useless.
>>7531256 PB 2019-12-17
Patriarch Kyrill visits Antarctica
John Kerry visits Antarctica
Sure gets a lot of "high ranking" visitors for a place that's "off limits".
https://qresear.ch/?q=admiral+byrd
https://qresear.ch/?q=kyril
I don't know if it's a real pyramid or not.
Before the Q op began anon was following everything related to Antarctica and was unable to verify if the rumored pyramid was real or not.
I still believe the domed "container" on POTUS' desk when he signed the NASA EO is highly symbolic.
Obviously. So is it time to dig Antarctica, or stay in "reality" and dig on current events & tweets etc.?
I'm willing to go either way.
Eventually, some day, we WILL dig on Antarctica and get moar info.
I don't know if this is the time to dig on it, but closely studying the Google Earth images of Antarctica, there are many anomalies that can be found. Of course, acknowledge we have no way of knowing if they are deliberate graphics artifacts placed there to confuse or obfuscate.
There appear to be multiple openings. Possible buried discs half obscured by snow. A row of what appear to be battle tanks half snow covered with their barrels all converging on a single point.
Anon did discover many images that were either a movie set or CGI depicting a buried "space ship" in an ice crevasse … (will not post believed-to-be-false images) this one was apparently to throw anons off the trial with a larp so that further discoveries about Antarctica could be discredited as false.
Monitoring the shipping traffic going to/from Antarctica there is another avenue for discovery.
There is a little bit published about each of the national Science Stations or outposts that can be dug.
There are budgets that can be dug.
China had a site there supposedly for testing laser transmissions to satellites.
The names of the various locales are also clues.
On the Google Earth imagery there are areas of greater and lesser resolution where aerial surveys were performed and added to the database.
There are certain mountain ranges that are rocky not icy.
Then there is the Piri Reis map from hundreds of years ago that appears to show the outlines of an Antarctic Continent without ice.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=piri+reis+map
I could go on.
Do we dig this now, or focus on current events? I don't want to slide, but there is a ton here that we can dig when we decide to focus on it.
baker article cap
>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-deploying-darpa-funded-information-warfare-tool-to-promote-biden
Need to emphasize it and get the info OUT into the INTERWEBZ.
Anons knowing it isn't enough.
The WORLD needs to know it too.
What have you done to spread the info?
>Remember What Q has said.
1.2 MB .txt file of "what Q has said".
That's 35,169 lines,
198,000 words
1.184 million characters
Not to mention images and cross references
What is a target?
What is a dart?
>[D]'s spent the last 3 years FALSELY accusing POTUS of being a Russian agent.
>Yet there is evidence the [D] party is controlled by China.
>Fake news is covering for and protecting the [D] party and pushing CCP talking points.
>Everything they accused POTUS of doing with Russia, these traitors are doing with China.
>Thankfully Q and POTUS were smart enough to activate Durham way back on OCT 28, 2017. Corrupted law enforcement would never prosecute fairly.
>[D] means DeepState
>They ran the Wuhan lab
>So it was not China that attacked
>It was the DeepState who attacked.
Does [D] mean Deep State?
Does [D] mean Dems?
Do double meanings exist?
Multiple meanings?
>Define your game.
>Define your players.
>Define your rules.
>Define your consequences.
>Should paint you a better picture of your goals.
Game: Control the Narrative
Players: Anons vs. MSM
Rules: ____
Consequences: ______
If we build it, memefag will draw it.
Anybody for fill in the blanks?
Maybe the game isn't just
Control the Narrative
but
Dispense the Truth
or
Wake up the World
or
?
How do you know the one giving orders is a "person"? Is that fact or assumption?