Knowing what you know now, I would suggest anons revist this specific "anon" and what they spoke of:
https:// www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5ee4wk/updated_for_anyone_interested_in_high_level/
I wonder how much Huawei and Tencent align…
It's me, grvl.
You need to listen to me.
It's my hope you've found the place I was pointing you toward. I gave you a couple of months, after all.
Whether or not there's been issues in the past with the bakers, which I've also been weary of, we should simply move forward now.
It wasn't the old room, but I trust you've learned that by this point.
Come now, search for me and Faith once more.
Take another look. I trust you'll find what you're looking for this time.
You've got the idea.
We are in fact notorious for "breaking" algorithms.
Why not give it another go?
Did /baph/ ever get transferred? They were sometimes the helpful type…
Blavatsky's work was very purposefully tainted via the likes of Bailey and her ilk.
I simply had a lot of conversations with the guy a few months ago and left his bunker once kun was restored.
I trust he'll find the message that was left for him.
I like to think we grew fond of each other over those few weeks, so this is me hoping I can reach him like this.
Thanks, anon. You're doing great.
Q is definitely a psyop but we're going to have to disagree on the intentions.
You're directing us to Bailey who skewed Blavatsky's work.
Should someone understand an untainted version of Blavatsky, they'll better understand what they're supposed to.