>>9025962 (Q about discernment question all sources) PB
Q
With every little bit of reapect one can have, some of us obviously try to decode, we have NO FORMAL TRAINING what-so-ever, had we.. we would know that 4 green masks, 2 purple gloves and 6 blue gloves means 426 on Qposts.. or whatever. We are doing the absolute best we can giving our circumstance/situation. I know you know that, but you have to know it is like trying to dry hump a cactus plant sometimes and given the way that people are marooned on their own islands via algos and all..
It is again like trying to have carnal knowledge w a damn bed of glass.. hard to get people to collaborate, hard to get any convo going. But not admitting failure or that it is impossible, we are ANON.
Not talking defeat, fuck all that.. just looking for a bridge to GET IT RIGHT and have the ability to do so w/o letting the enemy know what is going on.
ABSOLUTELY 100000% get game theory, can see situation on both sides of the razors edge.. anons not gettingtrustwhoever.. not seeing why what was said originally, applied to current situations is game theory, or how it can/could be.
Those of us who have been here long enough to know, are TRYING and spending a lot of time to do so. We want to be effective and to get the message out and to hear we have it wrong or to say we are “disinfo” is disingenuous and a bit of a shot to the gut.
We civilians DO NOT KNOW, each and every one of us stab in the dark trying to find our mark, but also basing some credible leads off of data sets to what is currently going on.. so not exactly in the dark. each one of us are in the same boat.
We can only use the tools we have each studied and tried our hardest to recognize. In the changing information War environment.
We are TRYING W ALL OUR HEARTS SIR/Ma’am.
Just know that..
WWG1WGA