>>9027467 (lb)
Watched it. You want to know what I realized? I realized this guy has probably never once questioned the Bible. To his credit, he makes a very valid argument; if you consider it from the perspective of a Christian that wholly believes the Bible is the infallible word of God. But that's because that's precisely how he's making his case.
>Think on that shit really hard for at least a minute or two.
Fact:
Not a single anon has made an eschatological argument for Q. Not a single one. Sure, people want to allow their confirmation biases make the case that Q is somehow a mission being hand-directed by God himself (or at least by people that are God-fearing servants of the Lord Jesus Christ). But there's another perspective here that is rarely talked about, if ever (I know I've brought it up many times with nothing but staunch bible-thumping responses; not many free-thinkers respond), and it's an uncomfortable one.
Q is making a veritable stab at turning the plan into a representation of events from the Bible. This does 2 things, and it's masterfully executed if you think about it:
-
100% fully engaged Q-followers that are Christian are going to believe it's prophecy fulfilled.
-
100% fully engaged Q-followers that are philosophical and free-thinking (perhaps Deist or maybe even Agnostic are the key words here) are going to see what Q is doing with all the biblical references as a tongue-in-cheek approach to discrediting it.
By way of doing this, and being about as vague as possible about it, Q ensures all groups are engaged in the "Great Awakening". Deists, Agnostics, and the very religious are going to read into this movement what they want (confirmation bias), and run with it because "at least we're not the ones fucking and eating children".
>Let that sink in a sec. Go back and read it several times if you need to. This is cruicial to how the plan gets participation up.
If you are of the absolutist stance that there's no truth in anything that is outside of Christ, and what religious leaders want you think in relation to Christianity, then you are not doing what Q is asking you to do (think for yourself), nor are you listening to Q's message in the least bit. You'd be like a kindergartener trying to wrestle wits with the likes of Thomas Jefferson or Ben Franklin; You don't stand a fucking chance. Christians need to start heavily analyzing this, especially. You know that one shill that runs rampant demanding that Q profess Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior of all? There's a reason Q's not answering, and it's sure as hell not because "duh, everyone believes that, hurr durr". It's because doing so would isntantly fracture the movement. After that, there'd be a major sideways distraction conversation instead of people digging, memeing, and praying.
@POTUS is a high IQ man; no question about this. @POTUS can be considered a godly person. He's clean; legally, life habits are good, he's always been on the right side of the law in regards to helping out the FBI, for example, during the 80s with his casino. We wouldn't know just how charitable he's been with his money because that would be hidden in those taxes he's not released. We do know that he's ran non profits for good causes, and doesn't run "foundations" like the DS folks do where they pretend to do the opposite of what they actually do. But come the fuck on. When that man "reads scripture" in his speeches, or in Q&A with interviewers, he acts like he's reading off a teleprompter. If that doesn't tell you all you need to know about his Bible-reading habits, I don't know what will.