>>9030650 lb

That is the most insane argument I've ever heard.

So, let's assume that once JFK (FATHER) died, that everyone was supposed to now call JFK JR just JFK, since his father died. Ok, then why didn't everyone call him just JFK for all those years until his death? Why? Because he was still known as JFK Jr.

Also, if we would have asked Q, is JFK dead (referring to the son), then how would Q have known that we were actually talking about the son and not the father??

Of course, the question had to be asked is JFK Jr alive, and not is JFK alive.

Q, then knowing that we were asking about the son, replied back NO. Meaning, that the son is not alive. He is dead. Not meaning that NO there is no JFK Jr to begin with.

Your logic is ILLOGICAL!! You're just trying very hard to keep a hoax alive to take away from what we are really trying to accomplish here and you are trying to make this movement look bad.