Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:11 p.m. No.9031712   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1724 >>2063

Hannity's a potential sleeper.

You decide.

He's riding Wray's ass when Wray being a good boy slow-walking for Durham.

Hannity's sources are glowies.

He wears the pin.

Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:20 p.m. No.9031805   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1832

>>9031765

>now the POO comes back at YOU

Wray doesn't need to leak shit.

He could release docs to Congress that they want.

Dims would In Peach POTUS if he fired Wray.

Pay Attention!

Love and respect to you and yours, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:25 p.m. No.9031879   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1994

>>9031832

Did he interfere with the Durham investigation?

Has Q laid out the path to show that Wray is acting in a way that benefits the plan?

Or are you overwhelmed with adversarial adrenaline right now and unwilling to debate the facts we know?

Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:28 p.m. No.9031918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9031835

McConnell straddles a fence that allows Anons to make a case for either side.

On the plus side, the judges thing he's been strong on - outside of not invoking the Nuclear Option that is.

Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:39 p.m. No.9032042   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9031950

>The Judge lets the Scarf Lady off way too easy

I thought so, too.

Some Anons (or Fox bots yeah those guys) were excited about it when it 1st dropped.

Anonymous ID: 34d7bc May 4, 2020, 6:50 p.m. No.9032220   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9031994

Not so much a WH that's a bit extreme.

I'm aware of his past associations.

You can say the same about Barr.

Why did POTUS hire Brix & Faux-Xi they're compd AF?

All I know using logic is that Q drops strongly indicate Wray is acting according to plan if Durham is the real deal.

>I dunno. Durham is silent as fuck

So is Wray (outside of std FBI Dir stuff).

No leaks - first time for that in a long time.