Mueller Thug Attorney Brandon Van Grack Caught Up in Many Questionable, Corrupt and Criminal Actions in Flynn Case

Back in February Cristina Laila reported — General Mike Flynn’s defense team hit Mueller’s prosecutor Brandon Van Grack in a new filing in support of his motion to dismiss the case for “egregious government misconduct.”

Flynn’s defense argued the government withheld evidence exculpatory to Flynn as a series of retaliatory actions against Flynn.

Flynn’s lawyers accused Brandon Van Grack of suppressing evidence to protect “the prosecutors, his team, and the cadre of malfeasant FBI agents from the discovery of their negligence, crimes, and wrongs.”

“Mr. Van Grack has suppressed evidence from the formation of the “Special Counsel Investigation” and likely even prior to it — for the very purpose of putting Mr. Flynn in the unjust position he now occupies while protecting the prosecutors, his team, and the cadre of malfeasant FBI agents from the discovery of their negligence, crimes, and wrongs,” Flynn’s lawyer wrote.

“There is a veritable litany of government misconduct here that is “outrageous” or “grossly shocking” and mandates dismissal of this prosecution.”

Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan canceled General Flynn’s sentencing scheduled for February 27 “until further order of the court.”

General Flynn formally asked to withdraw his guilty plea last month and accused federal prosecutors of “egregious government misconduct.”

Crooked Federal prosecutors then backed down and offered Flynn probation after asking for up to six months prison time!

Now this…

On Tuesday FOX News reported on Prosecutor Brandon Van Grack’s failure to to produce all evidence including favorable evidence on General Flynn to his attorneys.

Via FOX News:

Explosive, newly unsealed evidence documenting the FBI’s efforts to target national security adviser Michael Flynn — including a top official’s handwritten memo debating whether the FBI’s “goal” was “to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired” — calls into question whether Brandon Van Grack, a Justice Department prosecutor and former member of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Team, complied with a court order to produce favorable evidence to Flynn.

Since February 2018, Van Grack has been obligated to comply with D.C. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s standing order in the Flynn case to produce all evidence in the government’s possession “that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”

The order also requires the government to submit favorable defense evidence to the court, including possible “impeachment evidence” that could undermine witnesses, even if the government believes the evidence “not to be material.”

What Van Grack didn’t inform the court about – and didn’t provide to Flynn – was the newly unsealed January 4, 2017 “Closing Communication” from the FBI Washington Field Office, which recommended the FBI close its investigation of Flynn, as its exhaustive search through government databases “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts.”

Van Grack also failed to provide evidence to Flynn’s attorneys that anti-Trump former FBI agent Peter Strzok then immediately intervened and instructed the FBI case manager handling the Flynn investigation to keep the probe open, followed by indicators that the bureau would seek to investigate Flynn for possible violations of an obscure 18th century law known as the Logan Act — which has never been utilized in a modern prosecution.

Another Strzok text mentions that the FBI’s “7th floor” – meaning FBI leadership – may have been involved in the decision to keep the Flynn case alive.

Instead, Van Grack characterized Flynn’s alleged false statements as critical to the FBI’s “legitimate and significant investigation into whether individuals associated with the campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump were coordinating with the Russian government in its activities to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.”

Read the whole thing.

Obviously, Brandon Van Grack was caught this week repeatedly lying to the court and to the Flynn Team.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/justice-coming-mueller-thug-attorney-brandon-van-grack-caught-many-questionable-corrupt-criminal-actions-flynn-case/

>>9043915

blue hair dead give away

Wonder why Bill Gates and Co don't want us eating meat???

Vegans, Vegetarians Tend to Have Poorer Mental Health Than Meat Eaters, Study Finds

A new meta-analysis examining the link between the consumption or avoidance of meat and psychological health and well-being has found that a majority of studies observed showed an association between abstention from eating meat and poorer psychological health.

“Dietary choices have been a powerful indicator of social class and subsequent mate selection (e.g., whom we marry) since antiquity. Consequently, ‘what we eat’ and ‘how we eat’ are integral parts of our identity and directly influence our health via physiological, social, and psychological pathways,” Dr. Urska Dobersek, author of the study and an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Southern Indiana, told PsyPost.

“Therefore, given the dramatic surge in veganism and mental illness over the past two decades, a rigorous systematic review was a necessary first step in examining the relations between meat and mental health.”

The systematic review, published in the journal Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition on April 20, included an analysis of 18 studies, with a total of 160,257 participants represented from “multiple geographic regions.” Of the 85,843 women and 73,232 men examined, 149,559 were identified as meat-consumers, and 8,584 were meat-abstainers.

According to research findings, 11 of the 18 studies showed an association between meat abstention and poorer psychological health. Four of the studies analyzed exhibited an equivocal association, and the remaining three studies showed that those who abstained from meat had better psychological health.

Researchers contended that their findings show there is “clear evidence” that meat-abstainers tended to have greater rates of depression, self-harm and anxiety than their meat-eating counterparts.

Dobersek stressed to PsyPost that “correlation does not imply a causal relation” and went on to provide a number of examples to make sense of the findings, such as “individuals struggling with mental illness may alter their diets as a form of self-treatment; vegan and strict vegetarian diets may lead to nutrient deficiencies that increase the risk of mental illness; and many individuals with eating disorders use veganism and vegetarianism as a ‘cover’ to hide their illness.”

Overall, the analysis did not support the idea that avoiding meat was a good strategy to improve one’s psychological health.

https://sputniknews.com/society/202005051079207929-those-with-vegan-vegetarian-diets-tend-to-have-poorer-mental-health-than-meat-eaters—study/

>>9043945

Africa

>>9043951

Anti-Christ

>>9043964

kek hope so